Sign in
NeurosciencePLoS Computational Biology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Novelty is not Surprise: Human exploratory and adaptive behavior in sequential decision-making

Xu HeiD, Alireza ModirshanechiiD, Marco P. LehmanniD, Wulfram GerstneriD, Michael H. HerzogiD

Abstract

Classic reinforcement learning (RL) theories cannot explain human behavior in response to changes in the environment or in the absence of external reward. Here, we design a deep sequential decision-making paradigm with sparse reward and abrupt environmental changes. To explain the behavior of human participants in these environments, we show that RL theories need to include surprise and novelty, each with a distinct role. While novelty drives exploration before the first encounter of a reward, surprise increases the rate of learning of a world-model as well as of model-free action-values. Even though the world-model is available for model-based RL, we find that human decisions are dominated by model-free action choices. The world-model is only marginally used for planning but is important to detect surprising events. Our theory predicts human action choices with high probability and allows us to dissociate surprise, novelty, and reward in EEG signals.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
40
FWCI
2.20
Field percentile
top 11%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISFindling '19Modirshanec '22Zid '24Becker '26Modirshanec '25Zhang '25
70% semantic matchNeuroscience
Charles Findling, Vasilisa Skvortsova, Rémi Dromnelle+2 more·Nature Neuroscience·Oct 28, 2019· 196 citations