Psychological ReviewNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Saccadic omission revisited: What saccade-induced smear looks like
Richard SchweitzeriD, Mara Doering, Thomas SeeliD, Jörg RaischiD, Martin RolfsiD
Abstract
During active visual exploration, saccadic eye movements rapidly shift the visual image across the human retina. Although these high-speed shifts occur at a high rate and introduce considerable amounts of motion smear during natural vision, our perceptual experience is oblivious to it. This saccadic omission, however, does not entail that saccadeinduced motion smear cannot be perceived in principle. Using tachistoscopic displays of natural scenes, we rendered saccade-induced smear highly conspicuous. By systematically manipulating peri-saccadic display durations we studied the dynamics of smear in a time-resolved manner, assessing identification performance of smeared scenes, as well as perceived smear amount and direction. Both measures showed distinctive, U-shaped time courses throughout the saccade, indicating that generation and reduction of perceived smear occurred during saccades. Moreover, low spatial frequencies and orientations parallel to the direction of the ongoing saccade were identified as the predominant visual features encoded in motion smear. We explain these findings using computational models that assume no more than saccadic velocity and human contrast sensitivity profiles, and present a motion-filter model capable of predicting observers perceived amount of smear based on their eyes trajectories, suggesting a direct link between perceptual and saccade dynamics. Replays of the visual consequences of saccades during fixation led to virtually identical results as actively making saccades, whereas the additional simulation of perisaccadic contrast suppression heavily reduced this similarity, providing strong evidence that no extra-retinal process was needed to explain our results. Saccadic omission of motion smear may be conceptualized as a parsimonious visual mechanism that emerges naturally from the interplay of retinal consequences of saccades and early visual processing.
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rapid masking of saccadic motion results from low-velocity input and is largely invariant to movement amplitude
Wiebke Nörenberg, Richard Schweitzer, Martin Rolfs·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2026
- Object features survive motion at saccadic speed but lose their link to specific objects
Melis Ince, C. Hübner, M. Rolfs·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2026
- What one sees depends on how far the eye has moved
Yuanhao H. Li, Michele A. Cox, … Michele Rucci·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 30, 2026
- In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.
Jan-Nikolas Klanke, Sven Ohl, … Martin Rolfs·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2026
- Spatiotemporal evidence accumulation through saccadic sampling for object recognition
Zhihao Zheng, Jia Sheng Hu, Gouki Okazawa·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2025
- Perceptual saccadic suppression starts in the retina
Saad Idrees, Matthias Philipp Baumann, … Ziad M. Hafed·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2020