Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Rapid masking of saccadic motion results from low-velocity input and is largely invariant to movement amplitude

Wiebke NörenbergiD, Richard SchweitzeriD, Martin RolfsiD

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements sweep the visual scene across the retina, yet the resulting motion is rarely perceived. Visual factors alone, such as the presence of static pre- and post-saccadic input, can attenuate motion perception, suggesting effective masking of the motion signal during early visual processing. Here, we isolated the visual component of this reduction in motion perception using simulated saccades presented to fixating observers. Across two experiments, we manipulated motion amplitude (6-18 dva), duration, and velocity profile and measured perceived amplitude and velocity at varying masking durations. Visual masking strongly reduced perceived motion amplitude and velocity, with short halftimes ([~]15 ms) that were largely invariant across saccade amplitudes. Critically, motion following a naturalistic saccadic velocity profile was perceived as shorter and slower than constant-velocity motion matched in amplitude and duration, even without explicit masking. This additional reduction increased with both amplitude and duration. These results show that visual mechanisms alone can account for substantial motion reduction across a wide range of amplitudes and demonstrate a partially separable contribution of the saccadic velocity profile, suggesting that the temporal structure of retinal motion itself supports perceptual continuity across eye movements.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSchweitzer '25Li '26Rolfs '25Idrees '20Ince '26Crevecoeur '17
78% semantic matchNeuroscience
Richard Schweitzer, Mara Doering, Thomas Seel+2 more·Psychological Review·Jun 23, 2025· 12 citations