Journal of VisionNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Manipulating attentional priority creates a trade-off between memory and sensory representations in human visual cortex
Abstract
People often remember visual information over brief delays while actively engaging with ongoing inputs from the surrounding visual environment. Depending on the situation, one might prioritize mnemonic contents (i.e., remembering details of a past event), or preferentially attend sensory inputs (i.e., minding traffic while crossing a street). Previous fMRI work has shown that early visual areas can simultaneously represent both mnemonic and passively viewed visual information. Here we test the limits of such simultaneity by manipulating attention towards visual distractors during a working memory task performed by human subjects undergoing fMRI scanning. Participants remembered the orientation of a target grating while a distractor grating was shown throughout most of the memory delay. Critically, there were several subtle changes in the contrast and the orientation of the distractor, and participants were cued to either ignore the distractor, detect a change in contrast, or detect a change in orientation. Despite visual stimulation being matched in all three conditions, the fidelity of memory representations in early visual cortex was highest when the distractor was ignored, intermediate when participants attended distractor contrast, and lowest when participants attended the orientation of the distractor during the delay. In contrast, the fidelity of distractor representations was lowest when ignoring the distractor, intermediate when attending distractor-contrast, and highest when attending distractor-orientation. These data suggest a trade-off in early sensory representations when engaging top-down feedback to attend both seen and remembered features, and may partially explain memory failures that occur when subjects are distracted by external events.
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.15
- Field percentile
- top 48%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Value-driven attentional capture enhances distractor representations in early visual cortex
Sirawaj Itthipuripat, Vy A. Vo, … John T. Serences·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 9, 2019
- Comparing Neural Correlates of Memory Encoding and Maintenance for Foveal and Peripheral Stimuli
Güven Kandemir, Christian N. L. Olivers·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Sensory modality- and load-dependent changes across cortical representations for working memory storage
Vivien Chopurian, Simon Weber, Thomas B. Christophel·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Visual working memory representations of naturalistic images in early visual cortex are not sensory-like
Leonardo Pettini, Carsten Bogler, … John–Dylan Haynes·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2025
- Task-irrelevant features in working memory alter current visual processing
Hongqiao Shi, Qiqi Zhang, … Ya Li·Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and CognitionPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2025
- Simultaneous representation of sensory and mnemonic information in human visual cortex
Rosanne L. Rademaker, Chaipat Chunharas, John T. Serences·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2019