bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
The simulation extrapolation technique meets ecology and evolution: A general and intuitive method to account for measurement error
Abstract
O_LIMeasurement error and other forms of uncertainty are commonplace in ecology and evolution and may bias estimates of parameters of interest. Although a variety of approaches to obtain unbiased estimators are available, these often require that errors are explicitly modeled and that a latent model for the unobserved error-free variable can be specified, which in practice is often difficult. C_LIO_LIHere we propose to generalize a heuristic approach to correct for measurement error, denoted as simulation extrapolation (SIMEX), to situations where explicit error modeling fails. We illustrate the application of SIMEX using the example of estimates of quantitative genetic parameters, e. g. inbreeding depression and heritability, in the presence of pedigree errors. Following the original SIMEX idea, the error in the pedigree is progressively increased to determine how the estimated quantities are affected by error. The observed trend is then extrapolated back to a hypothetical error-free pedigree, yielding unbiased estimates of inbreeding depression and heritability. We term this application of the SIMEX idea to pedigrees "PSIMEX". We tested the method with simulated pedigrees with different pedigree structures and initial error proportions, and with real field data from a free-living population of song sparrows. C_LIO_LIThe simulation study indicates that the accuracy and precision of the extrapolated error-free estimate for inbreeding depression and heritability are good. In the application to the song sparrow data, the error-corrected results could be validated against the actual values thanks to the availability of both an error-prone and an error-free pedigree, and the results indicate that the PSIMEX estimator is close to the actual value. For easy accessibility of the method, we provide the novel R-package PSIMEX. C_LIO_LIBy transferring the SIMEX philosophy to error in pedigrees, we have illustrated how this heuristic approach can be generalized to situations where explicit latent models for the unobserved variables or for the error of the variables of interest are difficult to formulate. Thanks to the simplicity of the idea, many other error problems in ecology and evolution might be amenable to SIMEX-like error correction methods. C_LI
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- approach: simulation
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Improving accuracy and precision of heritability estimation in twin studies: Reassessing the measurement error assumption
Gang Chen, Dustin Moraczewski, Paul A. Taylor·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 2, 2025
- Assessing the impact of pedigree quality on the validity of quantitative genetic parameterestimates
- On the problems of not accounting for measurement- and sampling uncertainty in ecological and environmental models
C. Damgaard·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2020
- Putting life history theory to the test - the estimation of reproductive values from field data
M. J. Borger, J. Komdeur, … F. J. Weissing·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2022
- Including random effects in statistical models in ecology: fewer than five levels?
D. G. E. Gomes·bioRxiv·Apr 11, 2021
- Heritability, selection, and the response to selection in the presence of phenotypic measurement error: effects, cures, and the role of repeated measurements
E. Ponzi, L. F. Keller, … S. Muff·bioRxiv·Aug 14, 2018