BiostatisticsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Regression and Alignment for Functional Data and Network Topology
Danni TuiD, Julia WrobeliD, Theodore Daniel SatterthwaiteiD, Jeff GoldsmithiD, Ruben C. GuriD, Raquel E. GuriD, Jan GertheissiD, Dani S. BassettiD, Russell Taki ShinoharaiD
Abstract
In the brain, functional connections form a network whose topological organization can be described by graph-theoretic network diagnostics. These include characterizations of the community structure, such as modularity and participation coefficient, which have been shown to change over the course of childhood and adolescence. To investigate if such changes in the functional network are associated with changes in cognitive performance during development, network studies often rely on an arbitrary choice of pre-processing parameters, in particular the proportional threshold of network edges. Because the choice of parameter can impact the value of the network diagnostic, and therefore downstream conclusions, we propose to circumvent that choice by conceptualizing the network diagnostic as a function of the parameter. As opposed to a single value, a network diagnostic curve describes the connectome topology at multiple scales--from the sparsest group of the strongest edges to the entire edge set. To relate these curves to executive function and other covariates, we use scalar-on-function regression, which is more flexible than previous functional data-based models used in network neuroscience. We then consider how systematic differences between networks can manifest in misalignment of diagnostic curves, and consequently propose a supervised curve alignment method that incorporates auxiliary information from other variables. Our algorithm performs both functional regression and alignment via an iterative, penalized, and nonlinear likelihood optimization. The illustrated method has the potential to improve the interpretability and generalizability of neuroscience studies where the goal is to study heterogeneity among a mixture of function- and scalar-valued measures.
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Field percentile
- top 34%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Connectivity Regression
Neel Desai, Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani, … Jeffrey S. Morris·BiostatisticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2024
- Dynamics of Functional Network Organization Through Graph Mixture Learning
Ilaria Ricchi, Anjali Tarun, … Dimitri Van De Ville·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Feb 25, 2022
- Sparse graphical models for functional connectivity networks: best methods and the autocorrelation issue
Yunan Zhu, Ivor Cribben·Brain ConnectivityPeer-reviewed·Mar 29, 2018
- Comparing Community Detection Methods in Brain Functional Connectivity Networks
Reddy Rani Vangimalla, Jaya Sreevalsan‐Nair·Communications in computer and information sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Beyond modularity: Fine-scale mechanisms and rules for brain network reconfiguration
Ankit N. Khambhati, Marcelo Gomes Mattar, … Danielle S. Bassett·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2017
- Edge-centric functional network representations of human cerebral cortex reveal overlapping system-level architecture
Joshua Faskowitz, Farnaz Zamani Esfahlani, … Richard F. Betzel·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 19, 2020