Sign in
NeuroscienceJournal of Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

Increased connectivity among sensory and motor regions during visual and audiovisual speech perception

Jonathan Erik PeelleiD, Brent SpehariD, Michael S. JonesiD, Sarah M. McConkeyiD, Joel MyersoniD, Sandra HaleiD, Mitchell S. SommersiD, Nancy Tye‐Murray

Abstract

In everyday conversation, we usually process the talkers face as well as the sound of their voice. Access to visual speech information is particularly useful when the auditory signal is degraded. Here we used fMRI to monitor brain activity while adult humans (n = 60) were presented with visual-only, auditory-only, and audiovisual words. The audiovisual words were presented in quiet and several signal-to-noise ratios. As expected, audiovisual speech perception recruited both auditory and visual cortex, with some evidence for increased recruitment of premotor cortex in some conditions (including in substantial background noise). We then investigated neural connectivity using psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis with seed regions in both primary auditory cortex and primary visual cortex. Connectivity between auditory and visual cortices was stronger in audiovisual conditions than in unimodal conditions, including a wide network of regions in posterior temporal cortex and prefrontal cortex. In addition to whole-brain analyses, we also conducted a region-of-interest analysis on the left posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), implicated in many previous studies of audiovisual speech perception. We found evidence for both activity and effective connectivity in pSTS for visual-only and audiovisual speech, although these were not significant in whole-brain analyses. Taken together, our results suggest a prominent role for cross-region synchronization in understanding both visual-only and audiovisual speech that complements activity in "integrative" brain regions like pSTS.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
23
FWCI
1.93
Field percentile
top 13%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.