bioRxivPhysiology
Effects of CEPA and 1-MCP on flower bud differentiation of apple cv. ‘Nagafu No.2’ grafted on different rootstocks
W. Li, B. Chen, J. Mao, X. Li, J. Su, M. M. Dawuda, Z. Ma, C. Zuo, Z. An
Abstract
The apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) has a relatively long juvenile period which prevent the fruit breeding. The understanding of the flowering system is important to improve breeding efficiency in the apple. In this context, 2-year-old \"Fuji\" apple cv. \"Nagafu No.2\" trees that were grafted on dwarf self-rooted rootstock M.26, vigorous rootstock M. sieversii and interstock M.26/M. sieversii, respectively. Spraying with clean water (as controls), 800 mg{middle dot}L-1 2-Chloroethylphosphonic acid (CEPA) and 2 L{middle dot}L-1 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP). The results showed that CEPA significantly repressed the vegetative growth attributed to the increase of the ABA and ZT synthesis, and the decrease of IAA synthesis in leaves and buds. However, there was no significant difference or significant inverse effect between 1-MCP and control. Furthermore, CEPA promoted flower formation, increased the flowering rate and advanced the blossom period for 2 days compared with the control, which accompanied by the accumulation of soluble sugar, glucose and sucrose, and the increase of -amylase (-AMY) and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activities, and the decrease of the starch contents and sucrose synthase (SS) activities in leaves and buds. However, the blossom period was delayed for 2 days after spraying with 1-MCP. Finally, the expression of TFL1 was significantly repressed while the AP1 was significantly promoted in buds from M.26 and M.26/M. sieversii after spraying with CEPA, while the effect was not significant from M. sieversii. However, the expression levels of TFL1 and AP1 were not significantly different from the control after the application of 1-MCP. In spite of this, CEPA was more susceptible to easy-flowering M26, followed by M26/M. sieversii, and still less susceptible to difficult-flowering rootstock M. sieversii.\n\nAbbreviations
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- PERPETUAL FLOWERING2 coordinates the vernalization response and perennial flowering in Arabis alpina
A. Lazaro, Y. Zhou, … M. C. Albani·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2018
- Variation in scion water relations mediated by two newly released Geneva series rootstocks
E. Casagrande Biasuz, L. Kalcsits·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2021
- Fruit presence induces polar auxin transport in citrus and olive stem and represses hormone release from the bud
- TEMPRANILLO homologs in apple regulate flowering time in the woodland strawberry Fragaria vesca
A. Dejahang, N. Maghsoudi, … N. Mahna·bioRxiv·Feb 8, 2022
- Interaction of the Causal Agent of Apricot bud gall Acalitus phloeocoptes (Nalepa) with Apricot: Implications in Infested Tissues
L. Shijuan, S. Li, … B. Xu·bioRxiv·Apr 13, 2021
- CRISPR/Cas9 mutants delineate roles of Populus FT and TFL1/CEN/BFT family members in growth, dormancy release and flowering
X. Sheng, R. A. Mahendra, … A. M. Brunner·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2022