bioRxivImmunology
Machine Learning Analysis of Motor Evoked Potential Time Series to Predict Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis
J. Yperman, T. Becker, D. Valkenborg, V. Popescu, N. Hellings, B. Van Wijmeersch, L. Peeters
Abstract
BackgroundEvoked potentials (EPs) are a measure of the conductivity of the central nervous system. They are used to monitor disease progression of multiple sclerosis patients. Previous studies only extracted a few variables from the EPs, which are often further condensed into a single variable: the EP score. We perform a machine learning analysis of motor EP that uses the whole time series, instead of a few variables, to predict disability progression after two years. Obtaining realistic performance estimates of this task has been difficult because of small data set sizes. We recently extracted a dataset of EPs from the Rehabiliation & MS Center in Overpelt, Belgium. Our data set is large enough to obtain, for the first time, a performance estimate on an independent test set containing different patients.\n\nMethodsWe extracted a large number of time series features from the motor EPs with the highly comparative time series analysis software package. Mutual information with the target and the Boruta method are used to find features which contain information not included in the features studied in the literature. We use random forests (RF) and logistic regression (LR) classifiers to predict disability progression after two years. Statistical significance of the performance increase when adding extra features is checked with the DeLong hypothesis test.\n\nResultsIncluding extra time series features in motor EPs leads to a statistically significant improvement compared to using only the known features, although the effect is limited in magnitude ({triangleup}AUC = 0.02 for RF and {triangleup}AUC = 0.05 for LR). RF with extra time series features obtains the best performance (AUC = 0.75 {+/-} 0.07), which is good considering the limited number of biomarkers in the model. RF (a nonlinear classifier) outperforms LR (a linear classifier).\n\nConclusionsUsing machine learning methods on EPs shows promising predictive performance. Using additional EP time series features beyond those already in use leads to a modest increase in performance. Larger datasets, preferably multi-center, are needed for further research. Given a large enough dataset, these models may be used to support clinicians in their decision making process regarding future treatment.
- organism: human
- assay: electrophysiology
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- approach: machine learning (classical)
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Personalized prediction of rehabilitation outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a proof-of-concept using clinical data, digital health metrics, and machine learning
C. M. Kanzler, I. Lamers, … O. Lambercy·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2020
- Modeling individual disability evolution in multiple sclerosis patients based on longitudinal multimodal imaging and clinical data
Ceren Tozlu, Dominique Sappey‐Marinier, … Delphine Maucort‐Boulch·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2019
- Low-frequency motor cortex EEG predicts four levels of rate of change of force during ankle dorsiflexion
R. O'Keeffe, S. Y. Shirazi, … S. F. F. Atashzar·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2022
- Progression of regional grey matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis
Arman Eshaghi, Razvan Valentin Marinescu, … Jacqueline A. Palace·BrainPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2018
- Machine learning approaches to predicting whether muscles can be elicited via TMS
Fang Jin, Sjoerd M. Bruijn, Andreas Daffertshofer·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2023
- Predicting response to motor therapy in chronic stroke patients using Machine Learning
Ceren Tozlu, Dylan J. Edwards, … Amy F. Kuceyeski·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2018