Dispersal and polyandry evolve as competing inbreeding avoidance strategies

Understanding evolution of complex life-histories requires explicitly considering their multiple interactions, feedbacks, and shared drivers. Inbreeding depression is hypothesized to drive evolution of two life-histories which have far-reaching ecological and evolutionary consequence: dispersal and polyandry. Yet, the role of inbreeding depression in the separate evolution of these key life-histories is still debated, while the possibility for their joint evolution and consequent covariation has not been considered. I propose that dispersal and polyandry might be competing means of inbreeding avoidance which negatively feedback on each others evolution. Using a genetically explicit individual-based model, I first demonstrate that inbreeding depression can drive the separate evolution of dispersal and polyandry. Although this is largely known for dispersal, it is not as well established for polyandry evolution, which generally remains an evolutionary puzzle. Here, I show that polyandry can indeed evolve as means of indirect inbreeding avoidance in spatially structured populations. Second, when dispersal and polyandry can evolve jointly, a negative feedback emerges, such that they evolve as alternative inbreeding avoidance strategies across replicate systems, especially if there are fitness costs associated. Finally, although both dispersal and polyandry might be expected to shape the level of inbreeding depression, this is mainly affected by dispersal, while polyandry has a much more limited effect. These results emphasize the need to consider the potential joint evolution of dispersal and mating system in general, together with their genetic effects, to further our understanding of life-history evolution in spatially structured systems, and provide theoretical expectations for new empirical testing.