Sign in
NeuroscienceJournal of Neural Engineering
Peer-reviewed journal article

Trade-off between stimulation focality and the number of coils in multi-locus transcranial magnetic stimulation

Samuel Nurmi, Jere Karttunen, Victor Hugo SouzaiD, Risto Juhani IlmoniemiiD, Jaakko O. NiemineniD

Abstract

ObjectiveCoils designed for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) must incorporate trade-offs between the required electrical power or energy, focality and depth penetration of the induced electric field (E-field), coil size, and mechanical properties of the coil, as all of them cannot be optimally met at the same time. In multi-locus TMS (mTMS), a transducer consisting of several coils allows electronically targeted stimulation of the cortex without physically moving a coil. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the number of coils in an mTMS transducer, the focality of the induced E-field, and the extent of the cortical region within which the location and orientation of the maximum of the induced E-field can be controlled. ApproachWe applied convex optimization to design planar and spherically curved mTMS transducers of different E-field focalities and analyzed their properties. We characterized the trade-off between the focality of the induced E-field and the extent of the cortical region that can be stimulated with an mTMS transducer with a given number of coils. Main resultsAt the expense of the E-field focality, one can, with the same number of coils, design an mTMS transducer that can control the location and orientation of the peak of the induced E-field within a wider cortical region. SignificanceWith E-fields of moderate focality, the problem of electronically targeted TMS becomes considerably easier compared with highly focal E-fields; this may speed up the development of mTMS and the emergence of new clinical and research applications.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
26
FWCI
1.50
Field percentile
top 18%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISGomez '18Numssen '26Gomez '25Nieminen '21Lu '22Meng '19
86% semantic matchBioengineering
L. Gomez, S. Goetz, A. V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·Apr 13, 2018