randtip, a generalized framework to expand incomplete phylogenies using non-molecular phylogenetic information
Abstract
O_LIThe increasing availability of molecular information has lifted our understanding of species evolutionary relationships to unprecedent levels. However, current estimates of the worlds biodiversity suggest that about a fifth of all extant species are yet to be described, and we still lack molecular information for many of the known species. Hence, evolutionary biologists will have to tackle phylogenetic uncertainty for a long time to come. C_LIO_LIThis prospect has urged the development of software to expand phylogenies based on non-molecular phylogenetic information, and while the available tools provide some valuable features, major drawbacks persist and some of the proposed solutions are hardly generalizable to any group of organisms. C_LIO_LIHere, we present a completely generalized and flexible framework to expand incomplete molecular phylogenies. The framework is implemented in the R package randtip, a toolkit of functions that was designed to randomly bind phylogenetically uncertain taxa in backbone phylogenies through a fully customizable and automatic procedure that uses taxonomic ranks as a major source of phylogenetic information. C_LIO_LIAlthough randtip is capable of automatically generating fully operative phylogenies for any group of organisms using just a list of species and a backbone tree, we stress that the blind expansion of phylogenies (using randtip or any other available software) often leads to suboptimal solutions. Thus, we discuss a variety of circumstances that may require customizing simulation parameters beyond default settings to optimally expand the trees, including a detailed step-by-step workflow. C_LIO_LIPhylogenetic uncertainty should be tackled with caution, assessing potential pitfalls and opportunities to optimize parameter space prior to launch any simulation. Used judiciously, our framework will help evolutionary biologists to efficiently expand incomplete molecular phylogenies and thereby account for phylogenetic uncertainty in quantitative analyses. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A simple approach for maximizing the overlap of phylogenetic and comparative data
Matthew W. Pennell, Richard G. FitzJohn, William K. Cornwell·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2015
- Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life
Cody Hinchliff, Stephen A Smith, … Karen Ann Cranston·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2015
- PhylSim: A New Phylogenetic Tool for Modeling Trait Evolution and Speciation
P. Spivakovsky, Píetro Lió, Melody Susan Clark·bioRxiv·May 13, 2020
- Are theoretical advances in distance-based tree learning practical for phylogenetic inference?
Anastasiia Kim, Andrey Y. Lokhov, … Emma E. Goldberg·bioRxiv·Jan 13, 2026
- FishPhyloMaker: An R package to generate phylogenies for ray-finned fishes
G. Nakamura, A. Richter, B. E. Soares·Ecological InformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2021
- For common community phylogenetic analyses, go ahead and use synthesis phylogenies
D. Li, L. Trotta, … B. H. Baiser·bioRxiv·May 7, 2019