Spatiotemporal, environmental, and behavioral predictors of Varroa mite intensity in managed honey bee apiaries
Laura BoehmiD, Lauren MossmaniD, Zoi RaptiiD, Adam G. DolezaliD, Sara M. CliftoniD
Abstract
Honey bees contribute substantially to the world economy through pollination services and honey production. In the U.S. alone, honey bee pollination is estimated to contribute at least $11 billion annually, primarily through the pollination of specialty crops. However, beekeepers lose about half of their hives every season due to disease, insecticides, and other environmental factors. Here, we explore and validate a spatiotemporal statistical model of Varroa destructor mite burden (in mites/300 bees) in managed honey bee colonies, exploring the impact of both environmental factors and beekeeper behaviors. We examine risk factors for Varroa infestation using apiary inspection data collected across the state of Illinois over 2018-19, and we test the models using inspection data from 2020-21. After accounting for spatial and temporal trends, we find that environmental factors (e.g., floral quality, insecticide load) are not predictive of Varroa intensity, while several beekeeper behaviors (e.g., smaller colony density, supplemental feeding, and mite monitoring/treatment) are protective against Varroa. Interestingly, while monitoring and treating for Varroa is protective, treating without monitoring is no more effective than not treating at all. This is an important result supporting Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approaches. Author SummaryHoney bees contribute substantially to the world economy through pollination services and honey production. However, beekeepers lose about half of their hives every season due to disease, insecticides, and other environmental factors. Pathogens, such as Varroa mites and the viruses they vector, are especially detrimental to colony health, and best practices for pest management remain contentious. In this study, we model Varroa destructor mite burden in managed honey bee colonies using apiary inspection data collected across the state of Illinois from 2018 - 2021. Our modelling approach accounts for both spatial and temporal trends, allowing us to investigate the marginal impacts of environmental factors and beekeeper interventions on mite burden. We show that treating for Varroa mites has a protective effect only when accompanied by a monitoring strategy, important evidence in favor of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approaches.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Field percentile
- top 21%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Morphological changes in the mandibles accompany the defensive behavior of Indiana mite biting honey bees against Varroa destructor
J. Smith, X. L. Cleare, … H. Li-Byarlay·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2020
- The payoffs and tradeoffs of hygienic behavior: A large-scale field study on a local population of honey bees
R. Seltzer, P. Kahanov, … V. Soroker·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2021
- Climatic predictors of prominent honey bee (Apis mellifera) disease agents: Varroa destructor, Melissococcus plutonius, and Vairimorpha spp.
Alison McAfee, Niloofar Alavi, … Maria Marta Guarna·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2024
- Are increasing honey bee colony losses attributed to Varroa destructor in New Zealand driven by miticide resistance?
R. A. McGruddy, M. Bulgarella, … P. J. Lester·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2023
- Mites alight! Sunflower crop area and pollen supplementation enhance honey bee resistance to Varroa destructor
E. C. Palmer-Young, R. Malfi, … L. S. Adler·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2021
- Can colony size of honeybees (Apis mellifera) be used as predictor for colony losses due to Varroa destructor during winter?
C. van Dooremalen, F. Van Langevelde·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2020