Journal of Neural EngineeringNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Influence of feedback transparency on motor imagery neurofeedback performance: the contribution of agency
Claire DussardiD, Léa PilletteiD, Cassandra DumasiD, Emeline PierrieauiD, Laurent HuguevilleiD, Brian LauiD, Camille JeunetiD, Nathalie GeorgeiD
Abstract
ObjectiveNeurofeedback (NF) is a cognitive training procedure based on real-time feedback (FB) of a participants brain activity that they must learn to self-regulate. A classical visual FB delivered in a NF task is a filling gauge reflecting a measure of brain activity. This abstract visual FB is not transparently linked--from the subjects perspective--to the task performed (e.g., motor imagery). This may decrease the sense of agency, that is, the participants reported control over FB. Here, we assessed the influence of FB transparency on NF performance and the role of agency in this relationship. ApproachParticipants performed a NF task using motor imagery to regulate brain activity measured using electroencephalography. In separate blocks, participants experienced three different conditions designed to vary transparency: FB was presented as either 1) a swinging pendulum, 2) a clenching virtual hand, 3) a clenching virtual hand combined with a motor illusion induced by tendon vibration. We measured self-reported agency and user experience after each NF block. Main resultsWe found that FB transparency influences NF performance. Transparent visual FB provided by the virtual hand resulted in significantly better NF performance than the abstract FB of the pendulum. Surprisingly, adding a motor illusion to the virtual hand significantly decreased performance relative to the virtual hand alone. When introduced in incremental linear mixed effect models, self-reported agency was significantly associated with NF performance and it captured the variance related to the effect of FB transparency on NF performance. SignificanceOur results highlight the relevance of transparent FB in relation to the sense of agency. This is likely an important consideration in designing FB to improve NF performance and learning outcomes.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Field percentile
- top 49%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Enhancement of motor performance by a training method combining motor imagery and neurofeedback
Chosei Sha, Kaori Tamura, Tsuyoshi Okamoto·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2020
- Online self-evaluation of fMRI-based neurofeedback performance
Santiago Muñoz-Moldes, Anita Tursic, … Rainer Goebel·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 21, 2024
- Motor Imagery EEG Neurofeedback Skill Acquisition in the Context of Declarative Interference and Sleep
Mareike Daeglau, Catharina Zich, … Cornelia Kranczioch·bioRxiv·Dec 11, 2020
- Neurofeedback training for improving motor performance in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ryoji Onagawa, Yoshihito Muraoka, … Mitsuaki Takemi·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 2, 2023
- Introducing Haptic Feedback in Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback: A Novel Approach to Modulate Primary Motor Cortex Activity
Mathis Fleury, Pauline Cloerec, … Anatole Lécuyer·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2024
- Determinants of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Performance and Improvement: a Machine Learning Mega-Analysis
Amelie Haugg, Fabian M. Renz, … David Steyrl·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2020