Combining multiple data sources in species distribution models while accounting for spatial dependence and overfitting with combined penalised likelihood maximisation
Abstract
O_LIThe increase in availability of species data sets means that approaches to species distribution modelling that incorporate multiple data sets are in greater demand. Recent methodological developments in this area have led to combined likelihood approaches, in which a log-likelihood comprised of the sum of the log-likelihood components of each data source is maximised. Often, these approaches make use of at least one presence-only data set and use the log-likelihood of an inhomogeneous Poisson point process model in the combined likelihood construction. While these advancements have been shown to improve predictive performance, they do not currently address challenges in presence-only modelling such as checking and correcting for violations of the independence assumption of a Poisson point process model or more general challenges in species distribution modelling such as overfitting.\nC_LIO_LIIn this paper, we present an extension of the combined likelihood frame-work which accommodates alternative presence-only likelihoods in the presence of spatial dependence as well as lasso-type penalties to account for potential overfitting. We compare the proposed combined penalised likelihood approach to the standard combined likelihood approach via simulation and apply the method to modelling the distribution of the Eurasian lynx in the Jura Mountains in eastern France.\nC_LIO_LIThe simulations show that the proposed combined penalised likelihood approach has better predictive performance than the standard approach when spatial dependence is present in the data. The lynx analysis shows that the predicted maps vary significantly between the model fitted with the proposed combined penalised approach accounting for spatial dependence and the model fitted with the standard combined likelihood.\nC_LIO_LIThis work highlights the benefits of careful consideration of the presence-only components of the combined likelihood formulation, and allows greater flexibility and ability to accommodate real datasets.\nC_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A joint distribution framework to improve presence-only species distribution models by exploiting opportunistic surveys
J. M. Escamilla Molgora, L. M. Sedda, … P. M. Atkinson·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2021
- Bayesian species distribution models integrate presence-only and presence-absence data to predict deer distribution and relative abundance.
V. Morera-Pujol, P. S. Mostert, … S. Ciuti·bioRxiv·May 23, 2022
- Evaluating Bayesian spatial methods for modelling species distributions with clumped and restricted occurrence data
D. W. Redding, T. Lucas, … K. E. Jones·PLOS ONEPeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2017
- Determining Best Practice for the Spatial Poisson Process in Species Distribution Modelling
- Clarifying species dependence under joint speciesdistribution modeling
A. E. Gelfand, S. Shirota·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2019
- Data quantity is more important than its spatial bias for predictive species distribution modelling
W. B. Gaul, D. Sadykova, … J. M. Yearsley·bioRxiv·May 24, 2020