bioRxivEcology
Taxonomically mixed blue mussel Mytilus populations are spatially heterogeneous and temporally unstable in the subarctic Barents Sea
J. Marchenko, V. Khaitov, M. Katolikova, M. Sabirov, S. Malavenda, M. Gantsevich, L. Basova, E. Genelt-Yanovsky, P. Strelkov
Abstract
Subarctic populations of blue mussels represented by "cryptic" species Mytilus edulis (ME) and M. trossulus (MT) have been studied less intensively than Arctic and boreal populations. Ecological features of ME and MT in sympatry are poorly known everywhere. The knowledge about mussels at the northeasternmost boundary of the Atlantic littoral communities on Murman coast of the Barents Sea is based on data obtained 50-100 years ago. Our study provides the first insight into the long-term dynamics of the Barents Sea mussels, the habitat segregation of ME and MT, and the interannual dynamics of their mixed settlements. The Tyuva Inlet (Kola Bay), which is 3 km long, was used as the study site. Mussels were found everywhere in the littoral and the sublittoral down to a depth of 4 m. Their characteristic habitats were sandbanks, littoral rocks, sublittoral kelp forests and "the habitat of the mussel bed" in the freshened top of the inlet. The main spatial gradients explaining the variability of demographics of the settlements (abundance, age structure, size) were associated with the depth and the distance from the inlet top. ME and MT were partially segregated by depth: ME dominated in the sublittoral and MT, in the littoral. In addition, ME dominated both in the littoral and in the sublittoral parts of the mussel bed. The ratio of species in the mixed settlements varied over time: between 2004 and 2010 the proportions of MT decreased everywhere, by 22 % on average. Historical data indicate that the abundance of the Murman mussels declined sharply between the 1960s and the 1970s, which coincided with the cooling of the Arctic. It seems that the populations have not completely recovered in the abnormally warm recent decades. The habitat distribution of mussels apparently changed with time, too: unlike today, in the 20th century mussels were rarely observed in kelps. We suggest that the spatial and temporal dynamics of subarctic mussels can be partly explained by the competition between ME and MT combined with their differing sensitivity to environmental factors.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Does winterkill explain contrasting demographics of winter-breeding freshwater mussel populations in Ishikari River floodplain?
J. Negishi, H. Izumi, … I. Koizumi·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2023
- Thermal selection shifts genetic diversity and performance in blue mussel juveniles
Jennifer C. Nascimento‐Schulze, Jahangir Vajedsamiei, … Robert P. Ellis·Evolutionary ApplicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2025
- Recruitment and abundance of intertidal barnacles and mussels along the Atlantic Canadian coast: pelagic influences and relationships with predator abundance
R. A. Scrosati, J. A. Ellrich·bioRxiv·Dec 25, 2017
- Lipidomics analysis of juveniles blue mussels (Mytilus edulis L. 1758), a key economic and ecological species.
V. A. Laudicella, C. Beveridge, … A. D. Hughes·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2019
- Non-native crustacean predators conditionally trigger inducible defense behaviors in blue mussel
Ruxin Dai, Christopher D. Wells·bioRxiv·Dec 6, 2025
- Molecular diversity of bivalve transmissible neoplasia of blue mussels in the Kola Bay (Barents Sea) indicates a recent migration of the cancer lineages between the North Pacific and Northern Europe
M. Skazina, N. Ponomartsev, … P. Strelkov·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2023