bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Active control modulates memory-related activity during encoding and encoding-retrieval similarity
Zhuolei DingiD, Shuge YuaniD, Jincheng Xu, Shudong ZhangiD, Simon HanslmayriD, Xun LiuiD, Mingxia ZhangiD
Abstract
Self-directed learning allows learners to actively control their learning experience and has been shown to enhance memory compared with matched yoked learning. However, it remains unclear when and how active control modulates memory-related neural activity during learning and retrieval. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) while participants encoded objects under active and yoked learning conditions and again during a delayed recognition test approximately 24 h later. We examined event-related potential (ERP) activity across earlier processing windows, including pre-stimulus slow potentials and early N2 activity, and later processing windows, including P300, late slow-wave, and post-stimulus slow-potential activity. We also examined encoding-retrieval similarity (ERS) between neural patterns during encoding and retrieval. Behaviorally, active control improved delayed recognition, with the advantage selectively expressed in detailed recognition. In the ERP analyses, earlier processing windows showed memory-related effects, with pre-stimulus slow-potential and N2 activity differentiating subsequently remembered from forgotten items, but were not modulated by active control. By contrast, active control modulated later memory-related ERP activity, with remembered-forgotten differences expressed during late stimulus-related and immediate post-stimulus processing only in the active condition. ERS showed a similar active-control modulation: memory-related encoding-retrieval pattern similarity was evident under active learning, but not under yoked learning, with this effect involving relatively late encoding and retrieval windows. Together, these findings support a constructive-processing account, suggesting that memory formation under active control depends more strongly on rich, detailed encoding representations that can be reinstated during retrieval.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Tracking selective rehearsal and active inhibition of memory traces in directed forgetting
Marie-Christin Fellner, Gerd Thomas Waldhauser, Nikolai Axmacher·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 21, 2020
- Encoding and Retrieval in Parallel: ERP Correlates of Continuous Recognition Memory for Natural Scenes
Elena Čėsnaitė, Niko A. Busch·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2026
- Probing the neural dynamics of mnemonic representations after the initial consolidation
Wei Liu, Nils Kohn, Guillén Fernández·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2020
- Memory encoding begins with spontaneous neural reactivation
Gemma Fernández‐Rubio, Elvira Brattico, … Leonardo Bonetti·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2026
- Pattern reinstatement and attentional control: overlapping processes during episodic long-term memory retrieval
Melinda Sabo, Daniel A. Schneider·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2022
- Spontaneous Pre-encoding Activation of Neural Patterns Predicts Memory
Talya Sadeh, Janice Chen, … Morris Moscovitch·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2018