bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Phonological and temporal regularities lead to differential ERP effects in self- and externally generated speech
Alexandra K. EmmendorferiD, Milene L. BonteiD, Bernadette M. JansmaiD, Sonja A. KotziD
Abstract
Some theories of predictive processing propose reduced sensory and neural responses to anticipated events. Support comes from M/EEG studies, showing reduced auditory N1 and P2 responses to self-compared to externally generated events, or when stimulus properties are more predictable (e.g. prototypical). The current study examined the sensitivity of N1 and P2 responses to statistical regularities of speech. We employed a motor-to-auditory paradigm comparing ERP responses to externally and self-generated pseudowords, varying in phonotactic probability and syllable stress. We expected to see N1 and P2 suppression for self-generated stimuli, with greater suppression effect for more predictable features such as high phonotactic probability and first syllable stress in pseudowords. We observe an interaction between phonotactic probability and condition on the N1 amplitude, with an enhanced effect of phonotactic probability in processing self-generated stimuli. However, the directionality of this effect was reversed compared to what was expected, namely a larger N1 amplitude for high probability items, possibly indicating a perceptual bias toward the more predictable item. We further observed an effect of syllable stress on the P2 amplitude, with greater amplitudes in response to first syllable stress items. The current results suggest that phonotactic probability plays an important role in processing self-generated speech, supporting feedforward models involved in speech production.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Auditory predictions and prediction errors in response to self-initiated vowels
Franziska Knolle, Michael Schwartze, … Sonja A. Kotz·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2019
- In the words of others: ERP evidence of speaker-specific phonological prediction
Marco Sala, Francesco Vespignani, … Francesca Peressotti·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2025
- Dynamic modeling of EEG responses to natural speech reveals earlier processing of predictable words
Jin Dou, Andrew James Anderson, … Edmund C. Lalor·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 28, 2025
- Cortical responses to natural speech reflect probabilistic phonotactics
Giovanni M. Di Liberto, Daniel D.E. Wong, … Alain De Cheveigné A·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2018
- Neural signals to violations of abstract rules using speech-like stimuli
Yamil Vidal, Perrine Brusini, … Tristan Andres Bekinschtein·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2019
- Can Prediction Error Explain Predictability Effects on the N1 during Picture-Word Verification?
Jack Edward Taylor, Guillaume A. Rousselet, Sara C. Sereno·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 22, 2024