henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of Proteome ResearchBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

How much storage precision can be lost: Guidance for near-lossless compression of untargeted metabolomics mass spectrometry data

Junjie TongiD, Miaoshan LuiD, Ruimin WangiD, Shaowei AniD, Jinyin WangiD, Tong WangiD, Cong XieiD, Changbin Brad YuiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

The size of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data has been increasing significantly. Several lossy compressors have been developed for higher compression rates. Currently, a comprehensive evaluation of what and how MS data (m/z and intensities) with precision losses would affect data processing (i.e., feature detection and compound identification) is absent. Here, we set an error threshold at 1% to assess the significance of the difference between two files in feature and compound detection results obtained from MZmine3. First, we examined that mzML files with both m/z and intensity encoded in 32-bit precision appear to be a preferred combination via msConvert, which has smaller file size and minor variation with other combinations of storage precision (<0.13%). We then identified that the absolute error of 10-4 for m/z had a feature detection error of 0.57% and compound detection error of 1.1%. For intensities, the relative error group of 2x10-2 had an error of 4.65% for features and 0.98% for compounds, compared with precision-lossless files. Taken together, we provided a reasonable scene-accuracy proposal, with a maximum absolute error of 10-4 for m/z and a maximum relative error of 2x10-2 for intensity. This guidance aimed to help researchers in improving lossy compression algorithms and minimizing the negative effects of precision losses on downstream data processing.

Citations
7
FWCI
0.68
Field percentile
top 38%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.