Sign in
NeuroscienceCommunications Biology
Peer-reviewed journal article

How Sample Size Influences The Replicability Of Task-Based fMRI

Benjamin O. TurneriD, Erick J. Paul, Michael B. MilleriD, Aron Keith BarbeyiD

Abstract

Despite a growing body of research suggesting that task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies often suffer from a lack of statistical power due to too-small samples, the proliferation of such underpowered studies continues unabated. Using large independent samples across eleven distinct tasks, we demonstrate the impact of sample size on replicability, assessed at different levels of analysis relevant to fMRI researchers. We find that the degree of replicability for typical sample sizes is modest and that sample sizes much larger than typical (e.g., N = 100) produce results that fall well short of perfectly replicable. Thus, our results join the existing line of work advocating for larger sample sizes. Moreover, because we test sample sizes over a fairly large range and use intuitive metrics of replicability, our hope is that our results are more understandable and convincing to researchers who may have found previous results advocating for larger samples inaccessible.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
390
FWCI
24.44
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISNee '19Lohmann '17Sadil '25Jiao '20Ostwald '19Chen '17
90% semantic matchNeuroscience
Derek Evan Nee·Communications Biology·Apr 12, 2019· 90 citations