European Journal of NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Can non-invasive brain stimulation modulate peak alpha frequency in the human brain? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Samantha K. MillardiD, Darrah B. Speis, Patrick SkippeniD, Alan KI ChiangiD, Wei‐Ju ChangiD, Andrew J. Lin, Andrew J. FurmaniD, Ali MazaheriiD, David Anthony SeminowicziD, Siobhan M. SchabruniD
Abstract
Peak alpha frequency, the dominant oscillatory frequency within the alpha range (8-12 Hz), is associated with cognitive function and several neurological conditions, including chronic pain. Manipulating PAF could offer valuable insight into the relationship between PAF and various functions and conditions and provide new treatment avenues. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively synthesise effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on PAF speed. Relevant studies assessing PAF pre- and post-NIBS in healthy adults were identified through systematic searches of electronic databases (Embase, PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus, The Cochrane Library) and trial registers. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was employed for assessing study quality. Quantitative analysis was conducted through pairwise meta-analysis when possible; otherwise, qualitative synthesis was performed. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020190512) and the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/2yaxz/). Eleven NIBS studies were included, all with a low risk-of-bias, comprising seven transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), three repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and one transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) study. Meta-analysis of active tACS conditions (eight conditions from five studies) revealed no significant effects on PAF (mean difference [MD] = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.32 to 0.08, p = 0.24). Qualitative synthesis provided no evidence that tDCS altered PAF and moderate evidence for transient increases in PAF with 10 Hz rTMS. There is limited evidence that NIBS can modulate PAF, and existing evidence does not demonstrate robust effects. Further studies employing standardised stimulation protocols are necessary to determine the potential of NIBS to modulate PAF.
- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Field percentile
- top 27%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Peak alpha frequency is not significantly altered by five days of experimental pain and repetitive transcranial stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Samantha K. Millard, Alan KI Chiang, … David Anthony Seminowicz·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2025
- tACS increases alpha burst duration in a frequency- and montage-specific manner
Julio Rodriguez‐Larios, Anna Ragone, … Caroline Di Bernardi Luft·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2026
- Assessing the predictive value of peak alpha frequency for the sensitivity to pain
Elisabeth S. May, Laura Tiemann, … Markus Ploner·PainPeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2025
- Modulating Brain Rhythms of Pain using Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)? A Sham-controlled Study in Healthy Human Participants
Elisabeth S. May, Vanessa D. Hohn, … Markus Ploner·Journal of PainPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2021
- Decomposing the effects of alpha-tACS on brain oscillations and aperiodic 1/f activity
Florian H. Kasten, René Lattmann, … Christoph Siegfried Herrmann·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2024
- Individualized Alpha-tACS for Modulating Pain Perception and Neural Oscillations: A Sham-Controlled Study in Healthy Participants
Yaser Fathi, Françoise Dissassuca, … Giulia Liberati·bioRxiv·Jan 16, 2025