Journal of VisionNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Representing Multiple Visual Objects in the Human Brain and Convolutional Neural Networks
Viola MocziD, Su Keun JeongiD, Marvin M. ChuniD, Yaoda Xu AiD
Abstract
Objects in the real world often appear with other objects. To recover the identity of an object whether or not other objects are encoded concurrently, in primate object-processing regions, neural responses to an object pair have been shown to be well approximated by the average responses to each constituent object shown alone, indicating the whole is equal to the average of its parts. This is present at the single unit level in the slope of response amplitudes of macaque IT neurons to paired and single objects, and at the population level in response patterns of fMRI voxels in human ventral object processing regions (e.g., LO). Here we show that averaging exists in both single fMRI voxels and voxel population responses in human LO, with better averaging in single voxels leading to better averaging in fMRI response patterns, demonstrating a close correspondence of averaging at the fMRI unit and population levels. To understand if a similar averaging mechanism exists in convolutional neural networks (CNNs) pretrained for object classification, we examined five CNNs with varying architecture, depth and the presence/absence of recurrent processing. We observed averaging at the CNN unit level but rarely at the population level, with CNN unit response distribution in most cases did not resemble human LO or macaque IT responses. The whole is thus not equal to the average of its parts in CNNs, potentially rendering the individual objects in a pair less accessible in CNNs during visual processing than they are in the human brain.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.13
- Field percentile
- 42th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Limited correspondence in visual representation between the human brain and convolutional neural networks
Yaoda Xu A, Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 6, 2021
- Neural responses in early, but not late, visual cortex are well predicted by random-weight CNNs with sufficient model complexity
Amr Farahat, Martin A. Vinck·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2025
- Neural Taskonomy: Inferring the Similarity of Task-Derived Representations from Brain Activity
Aria Y. Wang, Leila Wehbe, Michael J. Tarr·bioRxiv·Jul 19, 2019
- Capsule Networks as Recurrent Models of Grouping and Segmentation
Adrien Doerig, Lynn Schmittwilken, … Michael H. Herzog·bioRxiv·May 27, 2020
- Orthogonal Representations of Object Shape and Category in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks and Human Visual Cortex
Astrid A. Zeman, J. Brendan Ritchie, … Hans Op de Beeck·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Feb 12, 2020
- Brain-Guided Convolutional Neural Networks Reveal Task-Specific Representations in Scene Processing
Bruce C. Hansen, Michelle R. Greene, … Binghui Tang·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2025