Vocal repertoire of adult domestic pigs in a laboratory environment
Kathryn Y. Henley, Aimee L. BozemaniD, Betty PatiD, Candace L. FloydiD
Abstract
The use of domestic pigs in clinical training and biomedical research is expanding rapidly, increasing the need for reliable, noninvasive indicators of health and welfare. Vocal analysis offers a non-invasive promising tool, yet the acoustic repertoire of adult domestic pigs remains poorly defined. However, the vocalization repertoire of adult domestic pigs has yet to be characterized. This study characterizes the vocal repertoire of adult pigs housed in a biomedical research laboratory. Twelve mixed-breed pigs (2-3 months old; 5 males, 7 females) were recorded during routine husbandry and experimental procedures. Vocal classification was conducted using perceptual and objective clustering techniques. First, aural- visual (AV) inspection of spectrograms was used to construct a hierarchical repertoire. Second, a two-step cluster analysis based on six acoustic parameters (5% frequency, first quartile frequency, center frequency, 90% bandwidth, interquartile range bandwidth, and 90% duration) provided an objective classification. Agreement between methods was evaluated using Cramers V. A total of 1,136 vocalizations from 69 recordings were analyzed. AV classification revealed five major vocal classes-- grunt, squeal, complex, scream, and bark--subdividing into 16 distinct call types. Standardized definitions integrating descriptive and quantitative criteria are provided. The two-step cluster analysis identified two clusters as the optimal statistical solution, with moderate agreement between methods (Cramers V = 0.67, p < 0.0001). Most AV-defined call types aligned with previously reported repertoires, although whines, yelps, and stable screams were unique to this study. While two-cluster solutions are commonly reported, our findings indicate that richer acoustic structure exists and that high gradation among pig calls may limit the resolution of statistical clustering. These results establish a detailed acoustic framework for adult pig vocalizations and provide essential groundwork for developing predictive models to enhance welfare assessment and support comparative research in laboratory-housed pigs.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pig vocalizations contain shared acoustic structure for humans and machines, but limited correspondence with presumed affective valence
Wim Gorssen, Ben Sleurs, Carmen Winters·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2026
- The use of pigs vocalisation structure to assess the quality of human-pig relationship
A. S. Villain, C. Guerin, C. Tallet·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2022
- Emotional valence of conspecific vocalizations modulates auditory and limbic brain activity in juvenile pigs
Paul Coudert, Thibault DUSSOL, … Pierre‐Antoine Eliat·bioRxiv·May 19, 2026
- Unsupervised classification of graded animal vocalisations using fuzzy clustering
Benjamin Benti, Patrick JO Miller, … Charlotte Curé·BioacousticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2025
- An annotated bioacoustic dataset of dog vocalizations and related sounds during dog-human social play
Laura Veronica Cuaya, Paula Pérez Fraga, … Claus Lamm·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2026
- Current state of bioacoustics research of vocal repertoires
Dori M. Grijseels, Erich Pascal Malkemper·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2026