Journal of Human GeneticsGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
ACMG Secondary Findings in the Brazilian Rare Genomes Project: Insights from 5,402 genome sequencing
Eduardo PerroneiD, Luiza do Amaral VirmondiD, Antônio Victor Campos CoelhoiD, Marina de Franca Basto SilvaiD, Carolina MorenoiD, Joana Rosa Marques ProtaiD, Jessica Grasiela Araujo EspolaoriD, Michele Patricia MigliavaccaiD, Thiago Yoshinaga Tonholo SilvaiD, Caio Robledo D’Angioli Costa QuaioiD, José Ricardo Magliocco CeroniiD, Kelin CheniD, Renata Moldenhauer MinilloiD, Anne Caroline Barbosa TeixeiraiD, Renata Yoshiko Yamada, Vívian Pedigone CintraiD, Lucas Santos de SantanaiD, Gabriela Pereira Campilongo, Renata SilvaiD, Karla de Oliveira Pelegrino, João Bosco OliveiraiD, Tatiana Ferreira de AlmeidaiD
Abstract
PurposeSecondary findings (SF) are pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes unrelated to the primary purpose of genetic testing. The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) provides guidelines on which SF should be reported, involving 81 genes linked to different conditions. With the increasing use of genome sequencing (GS), SF are more frequently detected, presenting challenges for healthcare systems. The Brazilian population is often underrepresented in genomic studies, which limits population-specific knowledge. ObjectiveThis study aimed to outline the profile of SF in the Brazilian Rare Genomes Project (BRGP). MethodsWe analyzed retrospectively SF (ACMG) data from GS of 5,402 BRGP individuals. ResultsOf the 5,316 cases who consented to receive SF, 3.6% (191 cases) had at least one SF. The most common genes identified were TTR, TTN, and BRCA2. SF were mainly related to cardiovascular conditions (40.2%) and cancer predisposition (37.6%). Some variants, such as TTR: c.424G>A; p. (Val142Ile) and TP53: c.1010G>A; p. (Arg337His), were recurrent, reflecting population-specific traits and founder effects. Novel variants were 10.6% of SF. ConclusionSF rate varies across studies and populations. While SF can aid early diagnosis, their relevance is debated due to potential psychological and healthcare burdens. Effective genetic counseling and public health policies are essential.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Secondary findings in a large Pakistani cohort tested with whole genome sequencing
Aliaksandr Skrahin, Huma Arshad Cheema, … Volha Skrahina·Life Science AlliancePeer-reviewed·Jan 12, 2023
- Unveiling the Landscape of Reportable Genetic Secondary Findings in the Spanish Population: A Comprehensive Analysis Using the Collaborative Spanish Variant Server Database
Rosario Carmona, Javier Pérez-Florido, … CSVS Crowdsourcing Group·medRxiv·Aug 1, 2024
- Putative breast cancer risk variants from populations of South Asian ancestry are under-represented in public variant classification databases
Raveen Rony, Shenglong Deng, … David L. Goode·Breast Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2026
- Hereditary breast cancer next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel evaluation in the south region of Brazil: a novel BRCA2 candidate pathogenic variant is reported.
César Augusto Barros Duarte, C. A. M. dos Santos, … Sueli Massumi Nakatani·medRxiv·Feb 8, 2024
- The Brazilian Rare Genomes Project: validation of whole genome sequencing for rare diseases diagnosis
Antônio Victor Campos Coelho, Bruna Mascaro-Cordeiro, … João Bosco Oliveira·Frontiers in Molecular BiosciencesPeer-reviewed·May 2, 2022
- Using species richness calculations to model the global profile of unsampled pathogenic variants: examples from BRCA1 and BRCA2
Nandana D. Rao, Brian H. Shirts·medRxiv·Nov 9, 2022