Macroscale brain states support the control of semantic cognition
Xiuyi WangiD, Katya Krieger‐RedwoodiD, Yanni Cui, Jonathan SmallwoodiD, Yi DuiD, Elizabeth JefferiesiD
Abstract
Understanding how the human brain adapts to varying cognitive demands is crucial in neuroscience. Here, we examined how networks involved in controlled semantic retrieval reconfigure themselves to generate neurocognitive states appropriate to different task contexts. We parametrically varied the demands of two semantic tasks - global association and feature matching judgments - and contrasted these effects of cognitive control with those of non-semantic tasks. We then characterized these effects on the cortical surface and within a whole-brain state space, anchored by the top three dimensions of intrinsic connectivity. Our results revealed that demanding semantic association tasks elicited more activation in the anterior regions of the prefrontal and temporal cortex. In contrast, difficult semantic feature matching tasks produced more posterior activation, aligning closely with regions engaged during multiple demanding non-semantic tasks. In both semantic feature matching and non-semantic contexts, the difficulty effects were situated towards the controlled end of a dimension capturing functional separation between cognitive control and default mode regions. Conversely, in semantic association tasks, the difficulty effects elicited similar responses across both cognitive control and default mode networks. Furthermore, controlled association and non-semantic control were located towards the heteromodal end of a heteromodal- unimodal dimension, while semantic feature matching involved a brain state that was more visual and unimodal. These findings demonstrate that a variety of brain states underpin controlled cognition. Specifically, cognitive control regions interact with heteromodal semantic knowledge system to identify contextually relevant conceptual overlaps (e.g., associating DOG with BEACH), and separate from heteromodal memory regions for modality-specific conceptual overlaps (e.g., connecting DALMATIAN with BLACK AND WHITE).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A middle ground where executive control meets semantics: The neural substrates of semantic-control are topographically sandwiched between the multiple-demand and default-mode systems
Rocco Y.-C. Chiou, Elizabeth Jefferies, … Matthew A. Lambon Ralph·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2022
- Influence of cognitive control on semantic representation
Waitsang Keung, Daniel Osherson, Jonathan D. Cohen·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2016
- Disentangling the neural correlates of semantic and domain-general control: The roles of stimulus domain and task process
Victoria J. Hodgson, Matthew A. Lambon Ralph, Rebecca L. Jackson·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2024
- Context Free and Context-Dependent Conceptual Representation in the Brain
Zhiyao Gao, Li Juan Zheng, … Elizabeth Jefferies·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2022
- Distinct and Common Neural Coding of Semantic and Non-semantic Control Demands
Zhiyao Gao, Li Juan Zheng, … Elizabeth Jefferies·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 2, 2021
- The neural processes underpinning flexible semantic retrieval in visual and auditory modalities
Ximing Shao, Meichao Zhang, … Elizabeth Jefferies·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2026