Evaluation of out-of-distribution detection methods for data shifts in single-cell transcriptomics
Lauren TheunisseniD, Thomas MortieriD, Yvan SaeysiD, Willem WaegemaniD
Abstract
Automatic cell type annotation methods assign cell type labels to new, unlabeled datasets by leveraging relationships from a reference RNA-seq atlas. However, new datasets may include labels absent from the reference dataset or exhibit feature distributions that diverge from it. These scenarios can significantly affect the reliability of annotation predictions, a factor often overlooked in current automatic annotation methods. The field of out-of-distribution detection (OOD), primarily focused on computer vision, addresses the identification of instances that differ from the training distribution. Implementing OOD methods in the context of novel cell type annotation and data shift detection for single-cell transcriptomics may enhance annotation accuracy and trustworthiness. We evaluate 6 OOD detection methods: LogitNorm, MC dropout, Ensembles, Energy- based OOD, Deep NN and Posterior networks, for their annotation and OOD detection performance in both synthetical and real-life application settings. We show that OOD detection methods are able to accurately detect novel cell types and show their promise to detect severe data shifts on non-integrated datasets. Moreover, integration of the OOD datasets improves annotation performance, but interferes with OOD detection, diminishing novel cell type capabilities of the OOD methods.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Field percentile
- top 16%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Consensus prediction of cell type labels with popV
Can Ergen, Galen K. Xing, … Nir Yosef·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2023
- Cell-type annotation with accurate unseen cell-type identification using multiple references
Yi-Xuan Xiong, Meng-Guo Wang, … Xiao-Fei Zhang·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2023
- scDiagnostics: systematic assessment of cell type annotation in single-cell transcriptomics data
Anthony-Alexander Christidis, Andrew R. Ghazi, … Ludwig Geistlinger·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2026
- Deep learning does not outperform classical machine learning for cell-type annotation
Niklas Köhler, Maren Büttner, … Fabian Joachim Theis·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2021
- A Message Passing Framework for Precise Cell State Identification with scClassify2
Wenze Ding, Yue Cao, … Jean Yee Hwa Yang·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2025
- scDeepInsight: a supervised cell-type identification method for scRNA-seq data with deep learning
Shangru Jia, Artem Lysenko, … Tatsuhiko Tsunoda·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2023