Diversity and DistributionsPlant BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Setting priorities for the acquisition of primary plant occurrence data
Nadia BystriakovaiD, Pablo Hendrigo Alves de MeloiD, Alexandre AntonelliiD, Steven P. BachmaniD, Gemma L. C. BramleyiD, Matilda J. M. BrowniD, Gloria CéspedesiD, Martin CheekiD, Iain DarbyshireiD, Sebsebe DemissewiD, Juana De EgeaiD, Andrey Sergeevich ErstiD, Félix ForestiD, Ib FriisiD, Long‐Fei FuiD, A C.iD, Rajib GogoiiD, Laura V. S. JenningsiD, Carel C. H. JongkindiD, Bente Bang KlitgaardiD, Isabel LarridoniD, Eve LucasiD, Carla MaldonadoiD, Maira T. Martinez-UgartecheiD, Justin F. MoatiD, , Alexandre K. MonroiD
Abstract
AimEffective implementation of the Global Biodiversity Framework and Global Strategy for Plant Conservation depends on accurate species distribution data. Current vascular plant distribution data, while crucial for understanding terrestrial ecosystems, is often sparse and biased and requires significant expansion. This study developed a scalable approach to prioritize areas for plant occurrence data acquisition, adaptable to national priorities and providing a framework for botanical institutions to coordinate efforts and allocate resources. LocationGlobal. MethodsUsing a Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) analysis, we prioritized areas based on: (a) ecosystem service value; (b) floristic value threatened by climate or land-use change; and (c) uncertainty in species richness estimates, stratified by biome and region. Regional prioritization maps for Africa & Madagascar; East, South and Southeast Asia; Siberia and the Russian Far East; South America; and North & Central America were reviewed by botanical experts for validation. Scalability was assessed by comparing regional and global analyses. ResultsData-driven priority maps, divided into tree-dominated and grassland/deforested areas, largely received expert support. High similarity between global and regional maps demonstrated scalability. Main conclusionsOur approach provides a framework for supporting national implementation of the Global Biodiversity Framework. Variables and their weights can be tailored to national or local needs. The methods flexibility and adaptability extend to other taxonomic groups and objectives, such as protected area selection By prioritizing data acquisition, whether field-based or digital, this research promotes the efficient use of resources. A key advantage of this approach is its capacity to systematically translate expert opinion into explicit and quantitative criteria, which in turn facilitates clear communication with policymakers and funders.
- organism: plant (other)
- assay: field survey / ecological data
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Plant diversity darkspots for global collection priorities
I. Ondo, K. Dhanjal-Adams, … A. Antonelli·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2023
- Occurrence-based diversity estimation reveals macroecological and conservation knowledge gaps for global woody plants
B. Kusumoto, A. Chao, … Y. Kubota·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2023
- GreenMaps: a Tool for Addressing the Wallacean Shortfall in the Global Distribution of Plants
B. H. Daru·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2020
- Multi-scale planning helps resolve global conservation needs with regional priorities
D. S. Rinnan, Y. Sica, … W. Jetz·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2020
- Hotspot prioritizations show sensitivity to data type
K. E. A. Norman, E. P. White·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2019
- Global conservation prioritization approach provides credible results at a regional scale
M. Roswell, A. Espindola·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2023