eLifeNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Temporal integration is a robust feature of perceptual decisions
Alexandre HyafiliD, Jaime de la RochaiD, Cristina Pericas, Leor N. KatziD, Alexander C. HukiD, Jonathan W. PillowiD
Abstract
Making informed decisions in noisy environments requires integrating sensory information over time. However, recent work has suggested that it may be difficult to determine whether an animals decision-making strategy relies on evidence integration or not. In particular, strategies based on extrema-detection or random snapshots of the evidence stream may be difficult or even impossible to distinguish from classic evidence integration. Moreover, such non-integration strategies might be surprisingly common in experiments that aimed to study decisions based on integration. To determine whether temporal integration is central to perceptual decision making, we developed a new model-based approach for comparing temporal integration against alternative "non-integration" strategies for tasks in which the sensory signal is composed of discrete stimulus samples. We applied these methods to behavioral data from monkeys, rats, and humans performing a variety of sensory decision-making tasks. In all species and tasks, we found converging evidence in favor of temporal integration. First, in all observers across studies, the integration model better accounted for standard behavioral statistics such as psychometric curves and psychophysical kernels. Second, we found that sensory samples with large evidence do not contribute disproportionately to subject choices, as predicted by an extrema-detection strategy. Finally, we provide a direct confirmation of temporal integration by showing that the sum of both early and late evidence contributed to observer decisions. Overall, our results provide experimental evidence suggesting that temporal integration is an ubiquitous feature in mammalian perceptual decision-making. Our study also highlights the benefits of using experimental paradigms where the temporal stream of sensory evidence is controlled explicitly by the experimenter, and known precisely by the analyst, to characterize the temporal properties of the decision process.
- Citations
- 32
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Differentiating between integration and non-integration strategies in perceptual decision making
Gabriel M Stine, Ariel D Zylberberg, … Michael Neil Shadlen·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2020
- Decision-making through integration of sensory evidence at prolonged timescales
Michael Waskom, Roozbeh Kiani·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2018
- Probing the role of sequential sampling and integration in decisions about protracted, noiseless stimuli
Hadiseh Hajimohammadi, Kieran S. Mohr, … Simon P. Kelly·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2025
- Intrinsic timescales of sensory integration for motion perception
Woochul Choi, Se‐Bum Paik·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 8, 2019
- To integrate or not to integrate: Testing degenerate strategies for solving an accumulation of perceptual evidence decision-making task
Charles D. Kopec, Thomas Zhihao Luo, … Carlos D. Brody·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2024
- Stimulus reliability automatically biases temporal integration of discrete perceptual targets
Dragan Rangelov, Rebecca K. West, Jason B. Mattingley·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2020