How do spike collisions affect spike sortingperformance?

Abstract

Recently, a new generation of devices have been developed to record neural activity simultaneously from hundreds of electrodes with a very high spatial density, both for in vitro and in vivo applications. While these advances enable to record from many more cells, they also dramatically increase the amount overlapping "synchronous" spikes (colliding in space and/or in time), challenging the already complicated process of spike sorting (i.e. extracting isolated single-neuron activity from extracellular signals). In this work, we used synthetic ground-truth recordings to quantitatively benchmark the performance of state-of-the-art spike sorters focusing specifically on spike collisions. Our results show that while modern template-matching based algorithms are more accurate than density-based approaches, all methods, to some extent, failed to detect synchronous spike events of neurons with similar extracellular signals. Interestingly, the performance of the sorters is not largely affected by the the spiking activity in the recordings, with respect to average firing rates and spike-train correlation levels.