IEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Algorithms for Estimating Time-Locked Neural Response Components in Cortical Processing of Continuous Speech
Abstract
ObjectiveThe Temporal Response Function (TRF) is a linear model of neural activity time-locked to continuous stimuli, including continuous speech. TRFs based on speech envelopes typically have distinct components that have provided remarkable insights into the cortical processing of speech. However, current methods may lead to less than reliable estimates of single-subject TRF components. Here, we compare two established methods, in TRF component estimation, and also propose novel algorithms that utilize prior knowledge of these components, bypassing the full TRF estimation. MethodsWe compared two established algorithms, ridge and boosting, and two novel algorithms based on Subspace Pursuit (SP) and Expectation Maximization (EM), which directly estimate TRF components given plausible assumptions regarding component characteristics. Single-channel, multi-channel, and source-localized TRFs were fit on simulations and real magnetoencephalographic data. Performance metrics included model fit and component estimation accuracy. ResultsBoosting and ridge have comparable performance in component estimation. The novel algorithms outperformed the others in simulations, but not on real data, possibly due to the plausible assumptions not actually being met. Ridge had slightly better model fits on real data compared to boosting, but also more spurious TRF activity. ConclusionResults indicate that both smooth (ridge) and sparse (boosting) algorithms perform comparably at TRF component estimation. The SP and EM algorithms may be accurate, but rely on assumptions of component characteristics. SignificanceThis systematic comparison establishes the suitability of widely used and novel algorithms for estimating robust TRF components, which is essential for improved subject-specific investigations into the cortical processing of speech.
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 19
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predictors for Estimating Subcortical EEG Responses to Continuous Speech
Joshua P. Kulasingham, Florine L. Bachmann, … Emina Aličković·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 8, 2024
- Optimizing the multivariate temporal response function(mTRF) framework for better identification of neural responses to partially dependent speech variables
Konrad Dapper, Sarah Hollywood, … Marc F. Joanisse·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2026
- A Comparison of Temporal Response Function Estimation Methods for Auditory Attention Decoding
Daniel D.E. Wong, Søren A. Fuglsang, … Alain De Cheveigné A·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2018
- Neuro-Current Response Functions: A Unified Approach to MEG Source Analysis under the Continuous Stimuli Paradigm
Proloy Das, Christian J. Brodbeck, … Behtash Babadi·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2020
- The effects of data quantity on performance of temporal response function analyses of natural speech processing
Juraj Mesík, Magdalena Wojtczak·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 12, 2023
- Appropriate data segmentation improves speech encoding models
Ole Bialas, Edmund C. Lalor·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2024