bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
The Findings Workflow: An agentic, collaborative, provenance-tracked framework for scientific data analysis with Claude Code
Abstract
Scientists presented with quantitative data often face two related problems: confidence that an analysis is statistically and computationally correct, and provenance sufficient to reproduce the resulting figures and conclusions. Large language models (LLMs) can make sophisticated analyses accessible through a collaborative, conversational interface, but unstructured use can worsen both problems by producing plausible but incorrect results and obscuring the steps that produced them. Here we present the Findings Workflow, a free, open-source Claude Code plugin designed to retain the flexibility of conversational LLM-assisted analysis while placing it within a structured, verifiable, and reproducible environment. The workflow uses staged, gated progression to ensure the science, metadata, and data are understood and tested data loaders are built before downstream analysis begins. Specialized subagents perform statistical analysis, programming, visualization, research, reporting, and validation, with independent review incorporated throughout. The plugin also provides vetted analysis templates, conventions, and methodological guidance that serve as trusted sources of opinion when deciding how analyses should be performed. Scientists remain actively involved throughout, exploring their data and directing the analysis through natural-language conversation, while the workflow supplies structure, verification, and persistent state around that collaboration. Findings are recorded automatically together with the data, code, methods, figures, and provenance needed to reproduce them. We demonstrate the workflow with a worked example that reproduces central findings from a published plasma extracellular vesicle proteomics dataset examining Alzheimer's disease (Mag-Net). Together, these features are designed to make LLM-assisted scientific analysis easier to trust, inspect, and reproduce without sacrificing its conversational and exploratory nature.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- AIRUS: a simple workflow for AI-assisted exploration of scientific data
Kenneth D. Harris·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2025
- Benchmarking Large Language Models for Transcriptomic Data Analysis and Visualization: Multi-Model Workflow Evaluation
Anjali Iyer, Arjun Subedi, … Raga Krishnakumar·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2026
- ChromSkills enables interpretable and reproducible agentic chromatin data analysis
Yuxuan Zhang, Yiman Wang, … Yong Zhang·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2026
- Leveraging large language models for data analysis automation
Jacqueline A. Jansen, Artür Manukyan, … Altuna Akalin·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 21, 2025
- Scientific computing in the age of agentic AI: an exploratory field report
Jeremy Zheng Li, Alex Rubinsteyn, … Andrew Ho·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2026
- Verifiable Agentic Science on Public Infrastructure
Dannon Baker, Scott Cain, … Anton Nekrutenko·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2026