bioRxivPathologyPreprint
Nanovirseq: dsRNA sequencing for plant virus and viroid detection by Nanopore sequencing
V. J. Javaran, A. Poursalavati, P. Lemoyne, D. T. Ste-Croix, P. Moffett, M. L. Fall
Abstract
Worldwide, there is a need for certified clean plant materials to limit viral diseases spread. In order to design a robust and proactive viral-like disease certification, diagnostics, and management program, it is essential to have a fast, inexpensive, and user-friendly tool. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dsRNA-based nanopore sequencing can be a reliable method for the detection of viruses and viroids in grapevines or not. Compared to direct RNA sequencing from rRNA-depleted total RNA (rdTotalRNA), direct-cDNA sequencing from dsRNA (dsRNAcD) yielded more viral reads and detected all grapevine viruses and viroids detected using Illumina MiSeq sequencing (dsRNA-MiSeq). With dsRNAcD sequencing it was possible to detect low abundance viruses (e.g., Grapevine red globe virus) where rdTotalRNA sequencing failed to detect them. Indeed, even after removing rRNA, rdTotalRNA sequencing yielded low viral read numbers. rdTotalRNA sequencing was not sensitive enough to detect all the viruses detected by dsRNA-MiSeq. In addition, there was a false positive identification of a viroid in the rdTotalRNA sequencing that was due to misannotation of a host-driven read. For quick and accurate reads classification, two different taxonomical classification workflows based on protein and nucleotide homology were evaluated in this study, namely DIAMOND&MEGAND (DIA&MEG) and Centrifuge&Recentrifuge (Cent&Rec), respectively. Virome profiles from both workflows were similar except for grapevine endophyte endornavirus (GEEV), which was only detected using DIA&MEG. However, because DIA&MEGs classification is based on protein homology, it cannot detect viroid infection despite giving more robust results. Even though Cent&Recs virus and viroid detection workflow was faster (30 minutes) than DIA&MEGs (two hours), it could not provide the details and information DIA&MEG was able to provide. As demonstrated in our study, nanopore dsRNAcD sequencing and the proposed data analysis workflows are suitable and reliable for viruses and viroids detection, especially in grapevine where viral mixed infection is common.
- organism: plant (other)
- assay: long-read sequencing
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- VIPER-seq: Protein-mediated small RNA enrichment enhances plant virus detection at low viral abundance
Marie Gauthier, Flavia Sarti Bonora, … Felipe Fenselau de Felippes·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2026
- dsRNA-Seq: Identification of viral infection by purifying and sequencing dsRNA
Carolyn J. Decker, Halley R. Steiner, … Roy Parker·VirusesPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2019
- Virotest: a bioinformatics pipeline for virus identification in plants.
Daniel González‐Ibeas·bioRxiv·Feb 15, 2023
- Rapid Sequencing of Multiple RNA Viruses in their Native Form
Thidathip Wongsurawat, Piroon Jenjaroenpun, … Intawat Nookaew·Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 25, 2019
- BIRD-Seq: B2 Protein Integrated End-to-End Pipeline for dsRNA Detection and Nanopore Sequencing for Virus Monitoring
Athanasios Nikolaos Xhurxhi, Subhankar Sahu, … Christophe Ritzenthaler·bioRxiv·Jun 26, 2026
- Randomly primed, strand-switching MinION-based sequencing for the detection and characterization of cultured RNA viruses
K. T. Young, K. K. Lahmers, … J. B. Stanton·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2019