How certain are we? Development of an ensemble based framework for assessing astronaut cancer risks from space radiation
Abstract
I.A new approach to NASA space radiation risk modeling has successfully extended the current NASA probabilistic cancer risk model to an ensemble framework able to consider sub-model parameter uncertainty as well as model-form uncertainty associated with differing theoretical or empirical formalisms. Ensemble methodologies are already widely used in weather prediction, modeling of infectious disease outbreaks, and certain terrestrial radiation protection applications to better understand how uncertainty may influence risk decision-making. Applying ensemble methodologies to space radiation risk projections offers the potential to efficiently incorporate emerging research results, allow for the incorporation of future models, improve uncertainty quantification for underlying sub-models, and reduce the impact of subjective bias on risk projections. Moreover, risk forecasting across an ensemble of multiple predictive models can provide stakeholders additional information on risk acceptance if current health/medical standards cannot be met for future space exploration missions, such as human missions to Mars. In this work, ensemble risk projections implementing multiple sub-models of radiation quality, dose and dose-rate effectiveness factors, excess risk, and latency as ensemble members are presented. Initial consensus methods for ensemble model weights and correlations to account for individual model bias are discussed. In these analyses, the ensemble forecast compares well to results from NASAs current operational cancer risk projection model used to assess permissible mission durations for astronauts. However, a large range of projected risk values are obtained at the upper 95th confidence level where models must extrapolate beyond available biological data sets. Closer agreement is seen at the median + one sigma due to the inherent similarities in available models. Identification of potential new models, epidemiological data, and methods for statistical correlation between predictive ensemble members are discussed. Alternate ways of communicating risk and acceptable uncertainty with respect to NASAs current permissible exposure limits are explored.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Benchmarking Risk Predictions and Uncertainties in the NSCR Model of GCR Cancer Risks with Revised Low LET Risk Coefficients
F. A. Cucinotta, E. Cacao, … P. B. Saganti·bioRxiv·May 28, 2020
- Newly developing methodologies to investigate health hazards posed by ionizing radiation to human space missions
F. Ferrari, E. Szuszkiewicz·bioRxiv·Mar 28, 2022
- The calculation of the mutation frequency for humans at different proton doses in a mathematical model and estimation of the mutation risks for the space explorations
Miklos T. Kara, Bilge Melahat Demirköz·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2025
- Probabilistic risk assessment of pesticides under future agricultural and climate scenarios using Bayesian network
S. Mentzel, M. Grung, … J. Moe·bioRxiv·May 30, 2022
- Development of a Bayesian network for probabilistic risk assessment of pesticides
S. Mentzel, M. Grung, … J. Moe·bioRxiv·May 20, 2021
- 56Fe ion exposure increases the incidence of lung and brain tumors at a similar rate in male and female mice
S. R. Finkelstein, R. Patel, … D. G. Kirsch·bioRxiv·Jun 6, 2023