Landscape EcologyEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Perceived urban microhabitat heterogeneity impacts carabid beetle communities
Basile FinandiD, Meeri Tahvanainen, Heikki M. SetäläiD, David Johan KotzeiD
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Field percentile
- top 26%
Abstract
ContextThe habitat heterogeneity hypothesis predicts that increased environmental heterogeneity promotes biodiversity by providing more niches. However, few studies have examined whether human perceptions of heterogeneity align with the ecological responses of arthropods. ObjectivesWe investigated how perceived habitat heterogeneity translates into environmental variables. Then, we explored the effects of perceived habitat heterogeneity in remnant urban forests and parks on carabid beetle species richness, composition, and functional traits. MethodsWe examined carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) communities across three habitat types differing in perceived microhabitat heterogeneity: heterogeneous urban forests, homogeneous urban forests, and urban parks in Helsinki, Finland. ResultsEnvironmental data confirmed distinct habitat characteristics: for most variables measured, heterogeneous forest sites were more variable compared to homogeneous forest sites. Contrary to expectations, species richness was higher in homogeneous forests and parks and lower in heterogeneous forests. Community composition differed among habitats and was influenced by canopy openness and dead wood. Heterogeneous forests harboured fewer macropterous and open-habitat species, while homogeneous forests had more brachypterous and generalist species, indicating differences in dispersal capacity and habitat preferences. Body size at the community and population levels, and mass at the population level were generally unaffected. ConclusionsThese results suggest that while habitat heterogeneity shapes community structure and traits, species richness does not always increase with heterogeneity, highlighting complex relationships between environmental variables and beetle communities. We underscore the importance of considering specific habitat features, such as dead wood and canopy cover, for urban biodiversity conservation.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Habitat specialisation and dispersal capacity drive rapid carabid beetle responses to urban forest fragmentation
Basile Finand, David Johan Kotze·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2025
- Old growth attributes by chain saw: how between-patch heterogeneity changes the metacommunities of beetles in temperate forests
Oliver Mitesser, Marc W. Cadotte, … Jörg Müller·bioRxiv·Aug 30, 2025
- Small scale habitat components as key drivers of biodiversity in urban park design
Gema Trigos‐Peral, Joaquín Luis Reyes-López·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2026
- Temperate forest heterogeneity decreases local and landscape-scale spider diversity through habitat filtering despite species turnover
Jean-Léonard Stör, Julia Rothacher, … Jörg C. Müller·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2025
- Dung beetles do not profit from enhanced spatial heterogeneity in production forests: a large-scale forest manipulation experiment
Johanna Asch, Michael Scherer‐Lorenzen, … Marcell Karl Peters·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2025
- Small habitat patches can be the largest contributors to urban biodiversity across taxonomic groups
Kilian Perrelet, Lauren M. Cook, … Marco Moretti·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2026