bioRxivPlant BiologyPreprint
A comparison of root and shoot hydraulics, aquaporin expression and leaf gas exchange between two grapevine cultivars reveals differences in hydraulic control mediated by aquaporins
Silvina Dayer, Johannes Daniel Scharwies, Sunita Ramesh, Wendy Sullivan, Franziska Doerflinger, Vinay PagayiD, Stephen D Tyerman
Abstract
Hydraulics of plants that take different strategies of stomatal control under water stress are still relatively poorly understood. Here we explore how root and shoot hydraulics, gas exchange, aquaporin expression and abscisic acid (ABA) concentration in leaf xylem sap ([ABA]xylem) may be involved and coordinated. A comparison in responses to mild water stress and ABA application was made between two cultivars of Vitis vinifera L. previously classified as isohydric (Grenache) and anisohydric (Syrah). Grenache showed stronger adjustments of leaf, plant, and root hydraulic conductances to decreased soil moisture and a steeper correlation of stomatal conductance (gs) to [ABA]xylem than Syrah resulting in greater conservation of soil moisture, but not necessarily more isohydric behaviour. Under well-watered conditions, changes in vapour pressure deficit (VPD) had a strong influence on gs in both cultivars with adjustments of leaf hydraulic conductance. Grenache was more sensitive to decreases in soil water availability compared to Syrah that rather responded to VPD. There were stronger correlations between plant hydraulic parameters and changes in aquaporin gene expression in leaves and roots of Grenache. Overall, the results reinforce the hypothesis that both hydraulic and chemical signals significantly contribute to the differences in water conservation behaviours of the two cultivars.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rootstock effects on scion phenotypes in a ‘Chambourcin’ experimental vineyard
Z. Migicovsky, Z. N. Harris, … A. J. Miller·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2018
- PIP2;1 aquaporin promotes early stomatal closure in grapevine leaves during water stress
Caetano Albuquerque, Mina Momayyezi, … Andrew J. McElrone·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2026
- Water availability dynamics have long-term effects on mature stem structure in Vitis vinifera
S. Munitz, Y. Netzer, … A. Schwartz·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2018
- Symbiosis with Rhizophagus irregularis improves grapevine rootstock performances under water deficit conditions
Lucas Galimand, Martin Lamy, … Julie Chong·Physiologia PlantarumPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2026
- Transpiration Responses to Potential Volatile Signals and Hydraulic Failure in Single Leaves of Vitis vinifera (cv. Shiraz) and Arabidopsis thaliana (Col 0) Utilising Sensitive Liquid Flow and Simultaneous Gas Exchange.
S. L. Balacey, D. L. Capone, … S. Tyerman·bioRxiv·Jan 24, 2023
- VlbZIP30 of grapevine functions in drought tolerance via the abscisic acid core signaling pathway
Mingxing Tu, Xianhang Wang, … Xiping Wang·bioRxiv·Dec 11, 2017