henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of Neuroscience MethodsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

EEG-based classification models reveal differential neural processing of words and images

Neda R. MorakabatiiD, Alison S Thiha, Eitan SchechtmaniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

BackgroundMachine learning methods employing neuroimaging data are useful for monitoring the activation of neural representations. Specifically, they can be used to discern the brain networks engaged in processing specific categories of items. This approach has been employed on neuroimaging data, including functional magnetic resonance imaging data and electroencephalography (EEG) data. New methodHere, we present a task and an analytical pipeline for investigating category representations using EEG. Participants (N = 30) viewed a series of images and words of objects belonging to five categories (Animals, Tools, Food, Scenes, and Vehicles) and responded when items from the same category were presented consecutively. ResultsWe trained support vector machines on EEG data within participants and found that both image trials and word trials yielded significant category classification accuracy, with image trials achieving higher accuracy than word trials. When comparing categories in a pair-wise fashion, all pairs were statistically distinguishable for image trials, whereas only one pair was distinguishable for word trials. Parietal and Left Temporal electrodes contributed more to image classification than Frontal and Right Temporal electrodes. Category-specific activity patterns also generalized across participants for image trials. Comparison with existing methodsOur data and analytic pipeline yielded high classification accuracies, primarily for image trials, providing support for the utility of EEG data for neural decoding. ConclusionsThese methods can be instrumental for exploring the activation and reactivation of neural representations at the category level during wakefulness and, potentially, during offline states.

Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
16th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISOrima '23Shimizu '22Shahmohamma '20Bezsudnova '24Auerbach-As '23Aguilar '25
71% semantic matchNeuroscience
Taiki Orima, Isamu Motoyoshi·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2023· 3 citations