bioRxivEcology
How do King Cobras move across a major highway? Unintentional wildlife crossing structures may facilitate movement.
M. D. Jones, B. M. Marshall, S. N. Smith, M. Crane, I. Silva, T. Artchawakom, P. Suwanwaree, S. Waengsothorn, W. Wuster, M. Goode, C. T. Strine
Abstract
O_LIGlobal road networks continue to expand, and the wildlife responses to these landscape-level changes need to be understood to advise long-term management decisions. Roads have high mortality risk to snakes because snakes typically move slowly and can be intentionally targeted by drivers. C_LIO_LIWe investigated how radio-tracked King Cobras (Ophiophagus hannah) traverse a major highway in northeast Thailand, and if reproductive cycles were associated with road hazards. C_LIO_LIWe surveyed a 15.3km stretch of Highway 304 to determine if there were any locations where snakes, and other wildlife, could safely move across the road (e.g., culverts, bridges). We used recurse analysis to detect possible road-crossing events, and used subsets of King Cobra movement data to create dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models (dBBMM) in an attempt to show movement pathways association with possible unintentional crossing structures. We further used Integrated Step Selection Functions (ISSF) to assess seasonal differences in avoidance of major roads for adult King Cobras in relation to reproductive state. C_LIO_LIWe discovered 32 unintentional wildlife crossing locations capable of facilitating King Cobra movement across the highway. Our dBBMMs failed to show if underpasses were being used by telemetered individuals; however, the tracking locations pre- and post-crossing provided strong evidence of underpass use. Our ISSF suggested a lower avoidance of roads during the breeding season, though the results were inconclusive. With the high volume of traffic, large size of King Cobras and a 98.8% success rate of crossing the road in our study, we strongly suspect that individuals are using the unintentional crossing structures to safely traverse the road. C_LIO_LIFurther research is needed to determine the extent of wildlife underpass use at our study site and globally, alongside using previously proven fencing to facilitate their use. We propose that more consistent integration of drainage culverts and bridges could help mitigate the impacts of roads on some terrestrial wildlife, particularly in areas where roads fragment forests and wildlife corridors. C_LI
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- No room to roam: King Cobras reduce movement in agriculture
B. M. Marshall, M. Crane, … M. Goode·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2020
- Using bobcat (Lynx rufus) movement patterns to inform strategies for road mitigation
Margaret Mercer, Cheryl M. Mollohan, … Jesse M. Alston·bioRxiv·Jan 25, 2026
- Roads as ecological traps for giant anteaters
M. J. Noonan, F. Ascensao, … A. Desbiez·bioRxiv·Apr 2, 2021
- Side-Impact Collision: Mechanics of Obstacle Negotiation in Sidewinding Snakes
H. C. Astley, J. M. Rieser, … D. I. Goldman·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2020
- Carnivore-mediated seed crossings are more likely on roadkill hotspots
João Craveiro, Miguel N. Bugalho, Pedro Gonçalves Vaz·Biodiversity and ConservationPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2026
- The impact and implications of vehicle collisions on the endangered and endemic Zanzibar red colobus (Piliocolobus kirkii)
H. Olgun, M. K. Mohammed, … A. V. Georgiev·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2020