henhaobio
Sign in

Genome ResearchGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article

Whole-genome long-read sequencing downsampling and its effect on variant calling precision and recall

William T. HarveyiD, Peter EbertiD, Jana EbleriD, Peter A. AudanoiD, Katherine M. MunsoniD, Kendra HoekzemaiD, David PorubskỳiD, Christine R. BeckiD, Tobias MarschalliD, Kiran V. GarimellaiD, Evan E. EichleriD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Advances in long-read sequencing (LRS) technology continue to make whole-genome sequencing more complete, affordable, and accurate. LRS provides significant advantages over short-read sequencing approaches, including phased de novo genome assembly, access to previously excluded genomic regions, and discovery of more complex structural variants (SVs) associated with disease. Limitations remain with respect to cost, scalability, and platform-dependent read accuracy and the tradeoffs between sequence coverage and sensitivity of variant discovery are important experimental considerations for the application of LRS. We compare the genetic variant calling precision and recall of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and PacBio HiFi platforms over a range of sequence coverages. For read-based applications, LRS sensitivity begins to plateau around 12-fold coverage with a majority of variants called with reasonable accuracy (F1 score above 0.5), and both platforms perform well for SV detection. Genome assembly increases variant calling precision and recall of SVs and indels in HiFi datasets with HiFi outperforming ONT in quality as measured by the F1 score of assembly-based variant callsets. While both technologies continue to evolve, our work offers guidance to design cost-effective experimental strategies that do not compromise on discovering novel biology.

Citations
42

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMøller '20Eveleigh '25Santos '25Leduc '26Höps '25Hu '25
75% semantic matchBioinformatics
Peter Loof Møller, Guillaume Holley, Doruk Beyter+2 more·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2020· 12 citations