Sign in
NeuroscienceNeuroImage
Peer-reviewed journal article

Development of subcortical volumes across adolescence in males and females: A multisample study of longitudinal changes

Megan M. HertingiD, Cory E. JohnsoniD, Kathryn L. MillsiD, Nandita VijayakumariD, Meg DennisoniD, Chang LiuiD, Anne‐Lise GoddingsiD, Ronald E. DahliD, Elizabeth R. SowelliD, Sarah WhittleiD, Nicholas Brian AlleniD, Christian Krog TamnesiD

Abstract

The developmental patterns of subcortical brain volumes in males and females observed in previous studies have been inconsistent. To help resolve these discrepancies, we examined developmental trajectories using three independent longitudinal samples of participants in the age-span of 8-22 years (total 216 participants and 467 scans). These datasets, including Pittsburgh (PIT; University of Pittsburgh, USA), NeuroCognitive Development (NCD; University of Oslo, Norway), and Orygen Adolescent Development Study (OADS; The University of Melbourne, Australia), span three countries and were analyzed together and in parallel using mixed-effects modeling with both generalized additive models and general linear models. For all regions and across all samples, males were found to have significantly larger volumes as compared to females, and significant sex differences were seen in age trajectories over time. However, direct comparison of sample trajectories and sex differences identified within samples were not consistent. The trajectories for the amygdala, putamen, and nucleus accumbens were most consistent between the three samples. Our results suggest that even after using similar preprocessing and analytic techniques, additional factors, such as image acquisition or sample composition may contribute to some of the discrepancies in sex specific patterns in subcortical brain changes across adolescence, and highlight region-specific variations in congruency of developmental trajectories.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
185
FWCI
11.74
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBackhausen '24Marshall '25Smith '25Campbell '20Fish '19Lee '26
87% semantic matchNeuroscience
Lea L. Backhausen, Juliane Hilde Fröhner, Hervé Lemaître+26 more·Human Brain Mapping·Feb 15, 2024· 13 citations