Digital DiscoveryBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Decoding substrate specificity determining factors in glycosyltransferase-B enzymes - Insights from machine learning models
Samantha G. Hennen, Yannick J. BombleiD, Breeanna Rae UrbanowicziD, Vivek S. BharadwajiD
Abstract
Substrate specificity is an essential characteristic of any enzymes function and an understanding of the factors that determine this specificity is crucial for enzyme engineering. Unlike the structure of an enzyme which is directly impacted by its sequence, substrate specificity as an enzyme attribute involves a rather indirect relationship with sequence as it also depends on structural aspects that dictate substrate accessibility and active site dynamics. In this study, we explore the performance of classifier-based machine learning models trained on curated sequence and structural data for a class of glycosyltransferases (GTs), namely GT-Bs, to understand their substrate specificity determining factors. GTs enable the transfer of sugar moieties to other biomolecules such as oligosaccharides or proteins and are found in all kingdoms of life. In plants, GTs participate in the biosynthesis of plant cell wall biopolymers (eg: hemicelluloses and pectins) and are an integral part of the enzymatic machinery that enables the storage of carbon and energy as plant biomass. To elucidate the substrate specificity of uncharacterized GT-Bs, we constructed multi-label machine learning models (Support Vector Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors, Gaussian Naive-Bayes, Random Forest) that incorporate both sequence and structural features. These models achieve good predictive accuracies on test datasets. However, despite our use of structural information, we highlight that there is further scope for improvement in training these models to draw interpretable relationships between sequence, structure and substrate specificity determining motifs in GT-Bs.
- organism: plant (other)
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Glydentify: An explainable deep learning platform for glycosyltransferase donor substrate prediction
Ruili Fang, Lan Na, … Natarajan Kannan·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2026
- Computational characterization of the xanthan gum glycosyltransferase GumK
Davide Luciano, F. Emil Thomasen, … Gastón Courtade·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 10, 2025
- Deep evolutionary analysis reveals the design principles of fold A glycosyltransferases
Rahil Taujale, Aarya Venkat, … Natarajan Kannan·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2020
- Biochemical and structural characterization of glycosyltransferase family 61 proteins reveal a key determinant of sugar donor specificity
Hsin‐Tzu Wang, Jose Henrique Pereira, … Henrik Vibe Scheller·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2025
- Machine learning reveals sequence-function relationships in family 7 glycoside hydrolases
Japheth E. Gado, Brent E. Harrison, … Christina M. Payne·Journal of Biological ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2021
- Comparative study of two xanthan gum glycosyltransferases combining AI structure predictions and molecular modeling
Davide Luciano, Silje Sneve, Gastón Courtade·bioRxiv·Apr 13, 2026