Imaging biomarkers for primary motor outcome after stroke - should we include information from beyond the primary motor system?
Abstract
Hemiparesis is a common consequence of stroke to the primary motor system. Previous studies suggested that damage to additional brain areas might play a causal role in the occurrence and severity of hemiparesis and its recovery. Knowledge of these regions might be applied in the creation of imaging biomarkers for motor outcome prediction if lesion information from such areas carries predictive value. We assessed acute and chronic paresis of the upper limb in 102 patients with unilateral stroke. In a first experiment, the neural correlates of acute and chronic upper limb paresis were mapped by lesion behaviour mapping. Following the same approach, a lesion biomarker of corticospinal tract (CST) damage was mapped. This analysis served as an artificial control condition as the biomarker, by definition, is only causally related to damage of the CST. Mapping acute or chronic upper limb paresis implicated areas outside of the primary motor system. Likewise, mapping the CST lesion biomarker implicated several areas outside of the CST with high correspondence to areas associated with upper limb paresis. Damage to areas outside of the primary motor system thus might, to some degree, not play a causal role in hemiparesis. In a second experiment, we showed that lesion information from these areas outside of the primary motor system can be used to predict motor outcome. This was even the case for the CST lesion biomarker. Although the only causal source underlying the CST lesion biomarker was damage to the CST, lesion information that mainly included non-CST regions was able to predict the biomarker (non-significantly) better than information taken from only the CST itself. These findings suggest that simple theory-based biomarkers or qualitative rules to infer post-stroke outcome from imaging data might perform sub-optimally, as they do not consider the complexity of lesion data. Instead, high-dimensional models with data-driven feature selection strategies might be required.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Data-driven biomarkers outperform theory-based biomarkers in predicting stroke motor outcomes
Emily R. Olafson, Christoph Sperber, … Amy F. Kuceyeski·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2023
- Increased prevalence of a frontoparietal brain state is associated with better motor recovery in individuals with pontine stroke affecting dominant-hand corticospinal tract
Emily R. Olafson, Georgia Russello, … Amy F. Kuceyeski·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2022
- Cortical propagation as a biomarker for recovery after stroke
Gloria Cecchini, Alessandro Scaglione, … Thomas Kreuz·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 17, 2021
- Continuous lesion images drive more accurate predictions of outcomes after stroke than binary lesion images
Thomas M.H. Hope, Douglas Neville, … Cathy J. Price·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2024
- Smaller spared subcortical nuclei are associated with worse post-stroke sensorimotor outcomes in 28 cohorts worldwide
Sook‐Lei Liew, Artemis Zavaliangos‐Petropulu, … Matthew A. Edwardson·Brain CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2021
- Patterns of Structural Disconnection Driving Proprioceptive Deficits After Stroke
Mika Kaeja, Leila Gajiyeva, … Christopher J. Steele·bioRxiv·May 22, 2025