Returning Actionable Genomic Results in a Research Biobank: Analytic Validity, Clinical Implementation and Resource Utilization
Carrie L. Blout ZawatskyiD, Nidhi D ShahiD, Kalotina MachiniiD, Emma F. PereziD, Kurt Derek ChristenseniD, Hana ZoukiD, Marcie A. Steeves, Christopher Koch, Melissa Kurtz UvegesiD, Janelle Shea, Nina B. GoldiD, Joel B. KrieriD, Natalie Boutin, Lisa MahantaiD, Heidi L. RehmiD, Scott T. WeissiD, Elizabeth W. KarlsoniD, Jordan W. SmolleriD, Matthew S. LeboiD, Robert C. GreeniD
Abstract
Over 100 million research participants around the world have had research array-based genotyping (GT) or sequencing (GS), but only a small fraction of these have been offered return of actionable genomic findings (gRoR). Between 2017 and 2021, we analyzed genomic results from 36,417 participants in the Mass General Brigham Biobank and offered to confirm and return pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (PLPVs) in 59 genes. Variant verification prior to patient recontact revealed that GT falsely identified PLPVs in 44.9% of samples, and GT failed to identify 72.0% of PLPVs detected in a subset of samples that were also sequenced. GT and GS detected verified PLPVs in 1% and 2.5% of the cohort, respectively. Of 256 participants who were alerted that they carried actionable PLPVs, 37.5% actively or passively declined further disclosure. 76.3% of those carrying PLPVs were unaware that they were carrying the variant and over half of those met published professional criteria for genetic testing but had never been tested. This gRoR protocol cost approximately $129,000 USD per year in laboratory testing and research staff support, representing $14 per participant whose DNA was analyzed or $3,224 per participant in whom a PLPV was confirmed and disclosed. These data provide logistical details around gRoR that could help other investigators planning to return genomic results.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 72
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identification of actionable genetic variants in 4,198 Scottish volunteers from the Viking Genes research cohort and implementation of return of results
Shona M. Kerr, Lucija Klarić, … James F. Wilson·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 14, 2025
- Genotype-first approach to the detection of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk, and effects of risk disclosure to biobank participants
Liis Leitsalu, Marili Palover, … Neeme Tõnisson·European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2020
- A Model for Genome-First Care: Returning Secondary Genomic Findings to Participants and Their Healthcare Providers in a Large Research Cohort
Marci L.B. Schwartz, Cara Zayac McCormick, … Michael F. Murray·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 9, 2018
- Implementing a consultation service for translating genomic research findings into the clinic: lessons from the SickKids Genome Board
Amy Y. Pan, Kenzie Pulsifer, … Gregory Costain·Paediatrics & Child HealthPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2025
- Global Perspectives on Returning Genetic Research Results in Parkinson's Disease
Ai Huey Tan, Paula Saffie Awad, … the Global Parkinson’s Genetics Program (GP2)·Neurology GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2024
- Return of Results in a Global Sample of Psychiatric Genetics Researchers: Practices, Attitudes, and Knowledge
Gabriel Lázaro‐Muñoz, Laura N. Torgerson, Stacey Pereira·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2020