The Geometry of Cognitive Difficulty: A Dynamical Manifold Theory in Excitable Neural Networks

Abstract

Quantifying task difficulty remains an open theoretical problem in neuroscience and artificial intelligence. While difficulty is often treated as a scalar property of stimuli or optimization landscapes, neural computation unfolds as a transient reconfiguration of high-dimensional dynamical systems. Here we propose a dynamical manifold theory of difficulty based on heterogeneous, modular FitzHugh-Nagumo networks subjected to structured task demand. Task difficulty is modeled as a conflict-driven control parameter that perturbs competing neural submodules. We define four dynamical metrics: (i) transition action (energetic cost), (ii) peak dispersion entropy, (iii) coherence recovery deficit, and (iv) mean-field trajectory curvature. Across systematic sweeps of task demand, we demonstrate that difficulty does not collapse to a single axis but instead emerges as a multidimensional manifold. Energetic cost and dispersion entropy form a dominant axis, while geometric curvature and integration recovery exhibit partial independence and nontrivial correlations. These results suggest that cognitive difficulty corresponds to structured reorganization in neural state space rather than mere increases in activation amplitude. The proposed framework provides a biophysically interpretable foundation for linking neural dynamics, cognitive effort, and difficulty estimation in artificial systems.