henhaobio
Sign in

NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Brain structural connectivity predicts brain functional complexity: DTI derived centrality accounts for variance in fractal properties of fMRI signal

Josh NeudorfiD, Chelsea EkstrandiD, Shaylyn KressiD, Ron BorowskyiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

The complexity of brain activity has recently been investigated using the Hurst (H) exponent, which describes the extent to which functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) activity is self-similar vs. complex. For example, research has demonstrated that fMRI activity is more complex before than after consumption of alcohol and during task than resting state. The measurement of H in fMRI is a novel method that requires the investigation of additional factors contributing to complexity. Graph theory metrics of centrality can assess how centrally important to the brain network each region is, based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) counts of probabilistic white matter (WM) tracts. DTI derived centrality was hypothesized to account for the complexity of functional activity, based on the supposition that more sources of information to integrate should result in more complex activity. FMRI BOLD complexity as measured by H was associated with five brain region centrality measures: degree, eigenvector, PageRank, current flow betweenness, and current flow closeness centrality. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that degree centrality was the most robust predictor of complexity, whereby greater centrality was associated with increased complexity (lower H). Regions known to be highly connected, including the thalamus and hippocampus, notably were among the highest in centrality and complexity. This research has led to a greater understanding of how brain region characteristics such as DTI centrality relate to the novel Hurst exponent approach for assessing brain activity complexity, and implications for future research that employ these measures are discussed.

Citations
17
FWCI
1.34
Field percentile
top 23%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.