Population Status and Habitat Association of Swaynes Hartebeest (Alcelaphus Buselaphus Swaynei (Sclater, 1892)) in Maze National Park, Southern Ethiopia
Abstract
We investigated the population status and habitat association of the endemic Swaynes Hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus swaynei (Sclater, 1892)) in Maze National Park, Southern Ethiopia, in 2018 and 2019. Sample count method line-transect was used for the population estimation, while habitat association was made based on the abundance of individuals counted in each habitat. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and compared with {chi}2 test. The total estimated populations of Swaynes Hartebeest (SHB) in the study period were 1456 and 1492 during wet and dry seasons, respectively showing no seasonal variation. Among the total estimated population, 31% were adult males, 38.46% adult females, 13.97% sub adult males, 15.94% sub adult females and 1.07% young. The number of adult females was higher than the other age groups followed by adult males in both seasons. Significant differences were reported among age and sex structure of population size during both seasons (wet season: {chi}2= 58.423, df =3, P < 0.05; dry season: {chi}2=534.079, df= 4, P < 0.05). The maximum group size was 36 and the minimum was 1. The ratio of adult males to adult females was 1:1.24 and 1:1.24, sub-adult males to sub adult females was 1:1.16 and 1:1.12, adult males to sub-adult males was 1:0.36 and 1:0.56, adult females to sub-adult females was 1:0.33 and 1:0.49 in the wet and dry seasons, respectively. The male to female ratio was 1:1.22 and 1:1.19 during wet and dry seasons as well. The population trend among ten years were significantly differed ({chi}2 = 1.708, df= 9, P< 0.05). The SHB was distributed into three types of habitat (riverine forest, open grassland and scattered tree) with significant differences ({chi}2=1109.937, df = 3, P < 0.05). The savannah grass land was most preferable habitat followed by scattered tree habitat. Maintaining its critical habitat was highly recommended for sustainability of current population status.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Population Structure and Ecology of the African elephant (Loxodonta africana, Blumenbach, 1797) in Chebera Churchura National Park, Ethiopia.
A. T. Tsegaye, A. S. Bekele, A. G. Atikem·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2022
- Good moms: dependent-young and their mothers cope better than others with longer dry season in plains zebras
L. Thel, C. Bonenfant, S. Chamaille-Jammes·bioRxiv·Oct 18, 2021
- Spatial and temporal variation in small mammal abundance and diversity under protection, pastoralism and agriculture in the Serengeti Ecosystem, Tanzania
M. T. Shilereyo, F. J. Magige, … E. Roskaft·bioRxiv·Aug 6, 2019
- Challenges and opportunities in population monitoring of cheetahs
D. W. Linden, D. S. Green, … S. M. Dloniak·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2019
- Abundance, density, and social structure of African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) in a human-modified landscape in southwestern Gabon
Colin M. Brand, Mireille Johnson, … Nelson Ting·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2020
- The effect of habitat type on population distribution and abundance of Rothschilds Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis rothschildi) in Ruma National Park and Mwea National Reserve in Kenya
G. N. GATHUKU, D. O. Chiawo, … I. O. Ngare·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2021