Parameter and model recovery of reinforcement learning models for restless bandit problems
Ludwig DanwitziD, David MathariD, Elke Stefanie SmithiD, Deniz TuzsusiD, Jan PetersiD
Abstract
Multi-armed restless bandit tasks are regularly applied in psychology and cognitive neuroscience to assess exploration and exploitation behavior in structured environments. These models are also readily applied to examine effects of (virtual) brain lesions on performance, and to infer neurocomputational mechanisms using neuroimaging or pharmacological approaches. However, to infer individual, psychologically meaningful parameters from such data, computational cognitive modeling is typically applied. Recent studies indicate that softmax (SM) decision rule models that include a representation of environmental dynamics (e.g. the Kalman Filter) and additional parameters for modeling exploration and perseveration (Kalman SMEP) fit human bandit task data better than competing models. Parameter and model recovery are two central requirements for computational models: parameter recovery refers to the ability to recover true data-generating parameters; model recovery refers to the ability to correctly identify the true data generating model using model comparison techniques. Here we comprehensively examined parameter and model recovery of the Kalman SMEP model as well as nested model versions, i.e. models without the additional parameters, using simulation and Bayesian inference. Parameter recovery improved with increasing trial numbers, from around .8 for 100 trials to around .93 for 300 trials. Model recovery analyses likewise confirmed acceptable recovery of the Kalman SMEP model. Model recovery was lower for nested Kalman filter models as well as delta rule models with fixed learning rates. Exploratory analyses examined associations of model parameters with model-free performance metrics. Random exploration, captured by the inverse softmax temperature, was associated with lower accuracy and more switches. For the exploration bonus parameter modeling directed exploration, we confirmed an inverse-U-shaped association with accuracy, such that both an excess and a lack of directed exploration reduced accuracy. Taken together, these analyses underline that the Kalman SMEP model fulfills basic requirements of a cognitive model.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Exploration-exploitation mechanisms in recurrent neural networks and human learners in restless bandit problems
Deniz Tuzsus, A.M.A. Brands, … Jan Peters·Computational Brain & BehaviorPeer-reviewed·May 24, 2024
- Joint Modeling of Reaction Times and Choice Improves Parameter Identifiability in Reinforcement Learning Models
Ian C. Ballard, Samuel M. McClure·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2019
- Reliability of decision-making and reinforcement learning computational parameters
Anahit Mkrtchian, Vincent Valton, Jonathan Paul Roiser·Computational PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Feb 8, 2023
- Experience resetting in reinforcement learning facilitates exploration-exploitation transitions during a behavioral task for primates
K. Sakamoto, H. Okuzaki, … H. Mushiake·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2021
- The Interpretation of Computational Model Parameters Depends on the Context
Maria Katharina Eckstein, Sarah L. Master, … Anne Gabrielle Eva Collins·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2022
- Human belief state-based exploration and exploitation in an information-selective symmetric reversal bandit task
Lilla Horváth, Stanley J. Colcombe, … Dirk Ostwald·Computational Brain & BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Aug 2, 2021