Global Change BiologyEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Human footprint and forest disturbance reduce space use of brown bears across Europe.
Anne G. HerteliD, Aida ParresiD, Shane C. FrankiD, Julien RenaudiD, Nuria SelvaiD, Andreas ZedrosseriD, Niko BalkenholiD, Luigi MaioranoiD, Ancuța FedorcaiD, Trishna DuttaiD, Neda BogdanovićiD, Natalia Bragalanti, Silviu Chiriac, Duško ĆirovićiD, Paolo CiucciiD, Csaba DomokosiD, Mihai FedorcaiD, Stefano FilacordaiD, Slavomír FinďoiD, Claudio Groff, Miguel de Gabriel HernandoiD, Đuro HuberiD, Georgeta IonescuiD, Klemen JerinaiD, Alexandros A. KaramanlidisiD, , Marta De BarbaiD
Abstract
Three-quarters of the planets land surface has been altered by humans, with consequences for animal ecology, movements and related ecosystem functioning. Species often occupy wide geographical ranges with contrasting human disturbance and environmental conditions, yet, limited data availability across species ranges has constrained our understanding of how human impact and resource availability jointly shape intraspecific variation of animal space use. Leveraging a unique dataset of 752 annual GPS movement trajectories from 370 brown bears (Ursus arctos) across the species range in Europe, we investigated the effects of human impact (i.e., human footprint index), resource availability, forest cover and disturbance, and area-based conservation measures on brown bear space use. We quantified space use at different spatio-temporal scales during the growing season (May - September): home range size; representing general space requirements, 10-day long-distance displacement distances, and routine 1-day displacement distances. We found large intraspecific variation in brown bear space use across all scales, which was profoundly affected by human footprint index, vegetation productivity, and recent forest disturbances creating opportunity for resource pulses. Bears occupied smaller home ranges and moved less in more anthropized landscapes and in areas of higher resource availability. Forest disturbances reduced space use while contiguous forest cover promoted longer daily movements. The amount of strictly protected and roadless areas within bear home ranges were too small to affect space use. Anthropized landscapes may hinder the expansion of small and isolated populations, such as the Apennine and Pyrenean, and obstruct population connectivity, for example between the Alpine or Carpathian with the Dinaric Pindos populations. Our findings call for actions to maintain bear movements across landscapes with high human footprint, for example by maintaining forest integrity, to support viable bear populations and their ecosystem functions.
- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Political legacies shape bear use of anthropogenic spaces
Catalina Munteanu, Mihai Daniel Niță, … Ilse Storch·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2025
- Determinants and patterns of the endangered brown bear Ursus arctos habitat use in the French Pyrenees revealed by occupancy modeling
Blaise Piédallu, Pierre-Yves Quenette, … Olivier Gimenez·bioRxiv·Sep 19, 2016
- Human-brown bear conflicts in Turkey are driven by increased human presence around protected areas
E. Sikdokur, M. Naderi, … C. H. Sekercioglu·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2023
- Hogs sleep like logs: wild boars reduce the risk of anthropic disturbance by adjusting where they rest
G. Fradin, S. Chamaille-Jammes·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2023
- Sharing the trail: recreation effects on bear behaviour in a Canadian Rocky Mountain Park
Alexandra Dimitriou, Kaitlyn M. Gaynor, … A. Cole Burton·bioRxiv·Apr 4, 2026
- Time-dependent memory and individual variation in Arctic brown bears (Ursus arctos)
P. R. Thompson, M. A. Lewis, … A. E. Derocher·bioRxiv·Dec 9, 2021