Genetics in MedicineGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
A Framework for Automated Gene Selection in Genomic Screening
Lorena Lazo de la VegaiD, W. Yu, Kalotina MachiniiD, Christina Anne Austin-TseiD, Lingtong HaoiD, Carrie L. Blout ZawatskyiD, Heather Mason‐SuaresiD, Robert C. GreeniD, Heidi L. RehmiD, Matthew S. LeboiD
Abstract
An efficient framework to identify disease-causing genes is needed to evaluate genomic data for both individuals with an unknown disease etiology and those undergoing genomic screening. Here, we propose a framework for gene selection used in genomic analyses, including screening applications limited to genes with strong or established evidence levels and diagnostic applications that includes genes with less or emerging evidence of disease association. We extracted genes with evidence for gene-disease association from the Human Gene Mutation Database, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, and ClinVar to build a diagnostic gene list of 5,973 genes. Next, we applied stringent filters in conjunction with computationally curated evidence (DisGeNET) to create a list limited to 3,600 genes with stronger levels of evidence for disease association. When compared to manual gene curation efforts, including the Clinical Genome Resource, genes with strong or definitive disease associations are included in both gene lists at high percentages, while genes with limited evidence are largely removed. We further confirmed the utility of this approach in the screening of 45 ostensibly healthy genomes. Our approach efficiently creates highly sensitive gene lists for genomic applications, while remaining dynamic and updatable, enabling time savings in gene curation and review.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Field percentile
- top 30%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluating the clinical validity of gene-disease associations: an evidence-based framework developed by the Clinical Genome Resource
Natasha T. Strande, Erin Rooney Riggs, … Jonathan S. Berg·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 25, 2017
- ClinGen Expert Clinical Validity Curation of 164 Hearing Loss Gene-Disease Pairs
Marina T. DiStefano, Sarah E. Hemphill, … Keijan Zhang·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2019
- Curating genomic disease-gene relationships with Gene2Phenotype
T. Michael Yates, Morad Ansari, … Helen V. Firth·medRxiv·Feb 26, 2024
- Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs
Thomas Minten, Sarah Bick, … Dominique C. Pichard·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 9, 2025
- The MorbidGenes panel: a monthly updated list of diagnostically relevant rare disease genes derived from diverse sources
Robin‐Tobias Jauss, Bernt Popp, … Konrad Platzer·Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2024
- genepanel.iobio - an easy to use web tool for generating disease- and phenotype-associated gene lists
Aditya Ekawade, Matt Velinder, … Gábor Marth·BMC Medical GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2019