Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs
Thomas MinteniD, Sarah Bick, Sophia M. AdelsoniD, Nils GehlenborgiD, Laura M. AmendolaiD, François BoemeriD, Alison J. CoffeyiD, Nicolas Encina, Alessandra FerliniiD, Janbernd KirschneriD, Bianca E. RusselliD, Laurent ServaisiD, Kristen Lipscomb SundiD, Ryan J. TaftiD, Petros TsipourasiD, Hana ZoukiD, Aldona Zygmunt, Athina VerveriiD, Carol Wai-Kwan SiuiD, Emanuela PonziiD, Enrico BertiniiD, Huang Xinwen, Jovanka King, Karin S. KassahniD, Maria Koutsogianni, , Dominique C. PichardiD
Abstract
Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSPurposeC_ST_ABSOver 30 international studies are exploring newborn sequencing (NBSeq) to expand the range of genetic disorders included in newborn screening. Substantial variability in gene selection across programs exists, highlighting the need for a systematic approach to prioritize genes. MethodsWe assembled a dataset comprising 25 characteristics about each of the 4,390 genes included in 27 NBSeq programs. We used regression analysis to identify several predictors of inclusion, and developed a machine learning model to rank genes for public health consideration. ResultsAmong 27 NBSeq programs, the number of genes analyzed ranged from 134 to 4,299, with only 74 (1.7%) genes included by over 80% of programs. The most significant associations with gene inclusion across programs were presence on the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (inclusion increase of 74.7%, CI: 71.0%-78.4%), robust evidence on the natural history (29.5%, CI: 24.6%-34.4%) and treatment efficacy (17.0%, CI: 12.3%- 21.7%) of the associated genetic disease. A boosted trees machine learning model using 13 predictors achieved high accuracy in predicting gene inclusion across programs (AUC = 0.915, R{superscript 2} = 84%). ConclusionThe machine learning model developed here provides a ranked list of genes that can adapt to emerging evidence and regional needs, enabling more consistent and informed gene selection in NBSeq initiatives.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 73
- FWCI
- 36.84
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Selection of Genetic Conditions for Multi-State Genomic Newborn Screening in BEACONS-NBS
Nina B. Gold, Britt A. Johnson, … Robert C. Green·medRxiv·Mar 25, 2026
- A multi-dimensional framework for establishing and managing a genomic newborn screening program
Elena Schnabel‐Besson, Nicola Dikow, … Eva Caroline Winkler·European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2026
- Assessment of the variant prioritisation strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study
Joanna Kaplanis, Dasha Deen, … Dalia Kasperavičiūtė·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2025
- Long-term Penetrance of Disease Variants in Genes Prioritized for Genomic Newborn Screening: Evidence from Adult Biobanks
Nina B. Gold, Hana Zouk, … Robert C. Green·medRxiv·Jun 12, 2026
- Genomic sequencing for newborn screening: Results of the NC NEXUS project
Tamara S. Roman, Stephanie B. Crowley, … Jonathan S. Berg·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2020
- Exploring the feasibility, acceptability and impact of genomic newborn screening for rare diseases in England: A study protocol for the Generation Study - Process and Impact Evaluation
Celine Lewis, Emma Beecham, … Melissa K. Hill·Yearbook of pediatric endocrinologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 3, 2026