bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
k-BOOM: A Bayesian approach to ontology structure inference, with applications in disease ontology construction
Chris MungalliD, Sebastian Koehler, Peter N. RobinsoniD, Ian H HolmesiD, Melissa Anne HaendeliD
Abstract
One strategy for building ontologies covering domains such as disease or anatomy is to weave together existing knowledge sources (databases, vocabularies and ontologies) into single cohesive whole. A first step in this process is to generate mappings between the elements of these different sources. There are a number of well-known techniques for generating mappings (also known as ontology alignemnt), both manual and automatic[7]. Sometimes mappings are seen as an end in themselves, with the sources remaining in a loosely connected state. However, if we want to take the next step and use the mappings to integrate the different sources into a cohesive reference ontology, then we need to translate the mappings into precise logical relationships. This will allow us to safely merge equivalent concepts, creating a unified ontology. This translation is a non-trivial step, as each mapping can be interpreted as multiple different logical relationships, with each interpretation affecting the likelihood of the others. There is a lack of automated methods to assist with this last step; this resolution is typically performed by expert ontologists. Here we describe an ontology construction technique that takes two or more ontologies linked by hypothetical axioms, and estimates the most likely unified logical ontology. Hypothetical axioms can themselves be derived from semantically loose mappings. The method combines deductive reasoning and probabilistic inference and is called Bayesian OWL Ontology Merging (BOOM). We describe a special form k-BOOM that works by factorizing the probabilistic ontology into k submodules. We also briefly describe a supplemental lexical and knowledge-based technique for generating a set of hypothetical axioms from loose mappings. We are currently using this technique to build a merged disease ontology (Monarch Disease Ontology; MonDO) that unifies a broad range of vocabularies into a consistent and coherent whole.
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: Bayesian inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 20
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Machine learning with biomedical ontologies
Maxat Kulmanov, Fatima Zohra Smaili, … Robert Hoehndorf·bioRxiv·May 7, 2020
- Self-normalizing learning on biomedical ontologies using a deep Siamese neural network
Fatima Zohra Smaili, Xin Gao, Robert Hoehndorf·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2020
- Towards semantic interoperability: finding and repairing hidden contradictions in biomedical ontologies
Luke T. Slater, Georgios V. Gkoutos, Robert Hoehndorf·BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingPeer-reviewed·Dec 15, 2020
- Assembly and reasoning over semantic mappings at scale for biomedical data integration
Charles Tapley Hoyt, Klas Karis, Benjamin M. Gyori·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2025
- Semantic computing for human phenotypes
Robert C. Gentleman, Rafael S. Gonçalves, Vincent J. Carey·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2024
- IID-KG: An ontology-aligned literature-derived knowledge graph for infectious and immune-mediated diseases
Feng Pan, Yuan Zhang, … Jinfeng Zhang·bioRxiv·May 26, 2026